<rss version="2.0" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/">
    <channel>
        <title>HORAN</title> 
        <link>https://health.horanassoc.com</link> 
        <description>RSS feeds for HORAN</description> 
        <ttl>60</ttl> <item>
    <comments>https://health.horanassoc.com/health-compliance/blog/id/37339/dol-issues-guidance-on-arpa-cobra-subsidies#Comments</comments> 
    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> 
    <wfw:commentRss>https://health.horanassoc.com/DesktopModules/DnnForge%20-%20NewsArticles/RssComments.aspx?TabID=2479&amp;ModuleID=6073&amp;ArticleID=37339</wfw:commentRss> 
    <trackback:ping>https://health.horanassoc.com:443/DesktopModules/DnnForge%20-%20NewsArticles/Tracking/Trackback.aspx?ArticleID=37339&amp;PortalID=29&amp;TabID=2479</trackback:ping> 
    <title>DOL Issues Guidance on ARPA COBRA Subsidies</title> 
    <link>https://health.horanassoc.com/health-compliance/blog/id/37339/dol-issues-guidance-on-arpa-cobra-subsidies</link> 
    <description>On Wednesday, three entire days before its Saturday deadline, the DOL issued much anticipated FAQs on the COBRA subsidy provided for in the American Rescue Plan Act (&amp;ldquo;ARPA&amp;rdquo;).  As a reminder, ARPA provides for a 6-month COBRA subsidy for individuals who lost their group health plan coverage due to an involuntary termination or reduction in hours.  While the DOL filled in some of the holes for us, there are still some questions that we are left scratching our heads on (such as the mechanics of how employers will receive the credit). &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
There has been a lot of anticipation on how the prior DOL COVID relief on COBRA timing would interact with the timeframes related to the subsidy.  The normal COBRA timing is that individuals have 60 days after the date that they initially receive their COBRA election notice to elect COBRA continuation coverage. Due to the COVID-19 National Emergency, that timeframe was extended until the earlier of (i) one year or (ii) 60 days following the end of the National Emergency.  Under ARPA, all Assistance Eligible Individuals have 60 days from receipt of their extended election notice to elect COBRA or claim the subsidy if they are already enrolled in COBRA.&amp;nbsp;
&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
In the FAQs, the DOL stated that that an Assistance Eligible Individual has the choice of electing COBRA continuation coverage beginning April 1, 2021 (or beginning prospectively from the date of a qualifying event if the qualifying event is after April 1, 2021), OR electing COBRA continuation coverage starting from an earlier qualifying event if the individual is eligible to make that election, including under the extended time frames provided under the Joint Notice and EBSA Notice 2021-01.   The FAQs further clarified that the subsidy election period does not cut off an individual&amp;rsquo;s pre-existing right to elect COBRA continuation coverage, including under the extended time frames provided under the Joint Notice and EBSA Notice 2021-01. However, those previous extensions do not apply to the notices or elections related to the subsidy.  In other words, the COVID relief does not apply to the second election period and individuals only have 60 days from receipt of their second election notice to elect COBRA prospectively from April 1 on or to claim the COBRA subsidy.
&lt;p&gt;
Individuals are not eligible for the subsidy if they are eligible for other group health coverage or Medicare.  The FAQs confirmed that other coverage includes eligibility for coverage through a new employer&amp;rsquo;s plan, a spouse&amp;rsquo;s plan, or Medicare. Individuals that have coverage through the Marketplace or Medicaid may be eligible for the subsidy.  However, if such an individual enrolls in COBRA continuation coverage to obtain the subsidy they will no longer be eligible for a premium tax credit, advance payments of the premium tax credit, or the health insurance tax credit for health coverage during that period that may have been available through the Marketplace or Medicaid.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The subsidy is only for coverage periods from April 1, 2021 through September 30, 2021.  The subsidy does not extend the individual&amp;rsquo;s maximum coverage period.   Therefore, if an Assistance Eligible Individual&amp;rsquo;s COBRA period ends on June 30, 2021, the individual would only be eligible for 3 months of COBRA subsidy.  The FAQS confirm that individuals will not receive refunds for any premiums paid for periods prior to April.  If an individual has already paid their April premium in full, the employer or plan may either issue a refund or credit to the individual.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In addition to the FAQs, the DOL also issued model notices.  These model notices should be used as the starting point to satisfy your new notice requirements under ARPA.  There is a new general notice and election form for any qualified beneficiary who loses coverage due to a reduction in hours or involuntary termination of employment with a COBRA period beginning during the period of April 1 &amp;ndash; September 30.   The DOL issued an alternative notice for plans subject to state continuation coverage.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The DOL also issued a model extended election notice.  You can use this notice to inform all individuals who lost coverage due to involuntary termination or reduction in hours and who are still in their 18-month COBRA window in April 2021 of their subsidy rights.  Employers must send this notice to Assistance Eligible Individuals before May 31st whether the individual is currently enrolled in COBRA, previously declined COBRA or enrolled and later dropped COBRA.   This requirement does not apply to plans that are subject to state continuation requirements as there is no second election period for their participants under ARPA.   &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The DOL issued a summary of COBRA premium assistance,  which is to be enclosed with the other notices to help individuals know whether they are eligible for the subsidy.  This summary also includes the form that individuals will complete and return to let you know they qualify as an assistance eligible individual. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
ARPA also requires employers and plans to notify Assistance Eligible Individuals 15 &amp;ndash; 45 days before their COBRA subsidy will expire.  The DOL issued a model notice to be used for this purpose.  You do not need to send this notice if the individual is losing the subsidy due to becoming eligible for other group health plan coverage or Medicare.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the FAQs, the DOL clarified that the COVID relief on timing of providing notices under EBSA Disaster Relief Notice 2021-01 does not apply to the notices related to the COBRA subsidy.   A failure to timely send any of the above required notices could result in an excise tax on the employer of up to $100 per qualified beneficiary not to exceed $200 per family, for each day that the notice is late or not provided.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
While we may still receive additional guidance on the subsidies, we now have enough information that you should be taking action to comply.   Here are some recommended next steps:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Pull together a list of all individuals who lost coverage under your group health plans due to an involuntary termination of employment or reduction in hours on or after October 1, 2019. For plans only subject to state continuation, you will instead pull together a list of those on continuation coverage who lost coverage due to an involuntary termination of employment or reduction in hours and are still in their maximum continuation period.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Check with your COBRA administrator to determine how much they plan to assist you with.  &lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Draft an updated general election notice (or review the one created by your COBRA administrator) for use with individuals who have a COBRA qualifying event on or after April 1.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Draft the new extended election notice (or review the one created by  your COBRA administrator) and send to all potential Assistance Eligible Individuals before May 31.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: center;&quot;&gt;For additional information, please contact your HORAN representative.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: center;&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: center;&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;The information contained in this document is informational only and is not intended as, nor should it be construed as, legal or accounting advice. Neither HORAN nor its consultants provide legal, tax nor accounting advice of any kind. We make no legal representation, nor do we take legal responsibility of any kind regarding regulatory compliance. Please consult your counsel for a definitive interpretation of current statute and regulation, and their impact on you and your organization.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: center;&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;</description> 
    <dc:creator>Shelly Hodges-Konys</dc:creator> 
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2021 07:52:00 GMT</pubDate> 
    <guid isPermaLink="false">f1397696-738c-4295-afcd-943feb885714:37339</guid> 
    
</item>
<item>
    <comments>https://health.horanassoc.com/health-compliance/blog/id/36955/arpa-provides-cobra-subsidy-at-100#Comments</comments> 
    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> 
    <wfw:commentRss>https://health.horanassoc.com/DesktopModules/DnnForge%20-%20NewsArticles/RssComments.aspx?TabID=2479&amp;ModuleID=6073&amp;ArticleID=36955</wfw:commentRss> 
    <trackback:ping>https://health.horanassoc.com:443/DesktopModules/DnnForge%20-%20NewsArticles/Tracking/Trackback.aspx?ArticleID=36955&amp;PortalID=29&amp;TabID=2479</trackback:ping> 
    <title>ARPA Provides COBRA Subsidy at 100%</title> 
    <link>https://health.horanassoc.com/health-compliance/blog/id/36955/arpa-provides-cobra-subsidy-at-100</link> 
    <description>&lt;p&gt;Yesterday, Congress passed the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) and the bill is expected to be signed by President Biden in the coming days.&amp;nbsp; The bill provides a 100% COBRA premium subsidy for eligible employees beginning April 1, 2021, and ending on September 30, 2021. The new premium subsidy leaves employers with many questions - not just about the compliance impacts, but the administrative and financial implications of the bill as well.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Let&amp;rsquo;s start with the subsidy. Employers advance the subsidy to eligible employees and the subsidy is in turn provided to employers through a payroll tax credit. The credit is applied on the employers&amp;rsquo; quarterly taxes.&amp;nbsp; If the credit exceeds the payroll taxes due, any additional amounts are refunded to the employer when the Form 941 is submitted.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Next, it&amp;rsquo;s important to know which employees are eligible to receive a subsidy.&amp;nbsp; Not all individuals that are COBRA eligible will be eligible for subsidy.&amp;nbsp; The bill provides that individuals that experience a COBRA qualifying event due to involuntary termination of employment or reduction in hours are eligible for the subsidy.&amp;nbsp; But, those employees who terminate employment voluntarily are not eligible.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As mentioned above, the subsidy is available for six months at most.&amp;nbsp; It begins on April 1, 2021, and will end the earlier of: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;middot;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; An individual&amp;rsquo;s maximum COBRA coverage period; or &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;middot;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; September 1, 2021.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As a reminder, the maximum coverage period for many COBRA qualifying events is 18 months.&amp;nbsp; COBRA subsidies will end early if the individual becomes eligible for other group health plan coverage or Medicare.&amp;nbsp; And, while former employees are generally required to notify their employer if they become eligible for such coverage, the ARPA penalizes individuals $250 for failure to provide notice. If the failure to provide notice is intentional, the penalty is the greater of $250 or 110% of the subsidy amount.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Additionally, employers may allow subsidy eligible participants the ability to choose a different group health plan than the individual&amp;rsquo;s current plan. However, employers are not required to provide this choice.&amp;nbsp; The premium for the new plan cannot be higher than the premium for the employee&amp;rsquo;s previous plan, among other restrictions.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Act also requires notification to individuals that may be eligible for the subsidy.&amp;nbsp; Fear not, the Department of Labor is providing model notices within 30 days from the date of enactment.&amp;nbsp; The notice must include necessary forms for establishing eligibility for assistance, contact information for the plan administrator, a description of the extended election period, and a description of the option to enroll in other coverage (if offered). Such notice must be provided to all individuals who may be eligible for subsidy (those who were involuntarily terminated or lost coverage due to a reduction in hours) including former employees who elected COBRA and discontinued it.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Employers are also required to a send notices to enrolled former employees if their subsidy will expire prior to September 21, 2021.&amp;nbsp; This notice is not required in situations where coverage is ending due to eligibility for other group health plan coverage or Medicare. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One of the big questions still hanging in the air is how these new COBRA requirements are impacted by previously issued Department of Labor extensions of time.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;What Employers Should Do Now&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Unfortunately, there is not much to do until model notices are issued. Employers can:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;middot;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Begin conversations with their COBRA administrators, &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;middot;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Start compiling a list of potential subsidy eligible individuals for purposes of providing the required notices, and &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;middot;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Make any necessary budget adjustments to cover additional administrative costs (COBRA administrators are still trying to figure this out, but at a minimum, we expect that there will be postage and mailing charges)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Otherwise, the only thing we can do is take a deep breath, buckle our seatbelts, and settle in for the ride!&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Update: Thursday afternoon, March 11, 2021, President Biden signed the American Rescue Plan Act.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: center;&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Please contact your HORAN representative for additional information.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: center;&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: 13px;&quot;&gt;The information contained in this document is informational only and is not intended as, nor should it be construed as, legal or accounting advice. Neither HORAN nor its consultants provide legal, tax nor accounting advice of any kind. We make no legal representation, nor do we take legal responsibility of any kind regarding regulatory compliance. Please consult your counsel for a definitive interpretation of current statute and regulation, and their impact on you and your organization.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: 13px;&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description> 
    <dc:creator>Rachel Pappenfus</dc:creator> 
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2021 19:26:00 GMT</pubDate> 
    <guid isPermaLink="false">f1397696-738c-4295-afcd-943feb885714:36955</guid> 
    
</item>
<item>
    <comments>https://health.horanassoc.com/health-compliance/blog/id/36772/dol-extensions-of-time-continue#Comments</comments> 
    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> 
    <wfw:commentRss>https://health.horanassoc.com/DesktopModules/DnnForge%20-%20NewsArticles/RssComments.aspx?TabID=2479&amp;ModuleID=6073&amp;ArticleID=36772</wfw:commentRss> 
    <trackback:ping>https://health.horanassoc.com:443/DesktopModules/DnnForge%20-%20NewsArticles/Tracking/Trackback.aspx?ArticleID=36772&amp;PortalID=29&amp;TabID=2479</trackback:ping> 
    <title>DOL Extensions of Time Continue?</title> 
    <link>https://health.horanassoc.com/health-compliance/blog/id/36772/dol-extensions-of-time-continue</link> 
    <description>&lt;p&gt;You may recall that late last spring, the DOL and IRS issued extensions of time for certain participant and employer deadlines under COBRA, HIPAA, and ERISA.&amp;nbsp; See our original blog post &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.horanassoc.com/health-compliance/blog/id/31986/dol-and-irs-give-the-gift-of-time&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp; The rule provided that the period from March 1, 2020, through 60 days after the announced end of the COVID-19 national emergency, known as the &amp;ldquo;outbreak period,&amp;rdquo; must be disregarded for purposes of many plan and participant deadlines. At the time, no one contemplated that the pandemic would last this long and at issue is the fact that the agencies only had the statutory authority to grant extensions for up to one year.&amp;nbsp; This left all of us in the benefits community wondering whether the extensions would all just end on February 28,&amp;nbsp;2021? The DOL answered the question for us on Friday morning in &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.dol.gov/agencies/ebsa/employers-and-advisers/plan-administration-and-compliance/disaster-relief/ebsa-disaster-relief-notice-2021-01&quot;&gt;EBSA Disaster Relief Notice 2021-01&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While this guidance is welcome, it is not without its administrative challenges.&amp;nbsp; The new guidance states that extensions of time will not automatically end on February 28, 2021, for everyone, but that the one-year statutory relief will be applied on a participant by participant basis. And, we all thought the original guidance was confusing! Under the new guidance, a participant&amp;rsquo;s relief for purposes of actions such as COBRA election or payment for example, will end as of the EARLIER of: (i) one year from the date the individual was first eligible for relief; or (ii) 60 days after the announced end of the National Emergency.&amp;nbsp; The relief end date is applied in the same fashion to a plan sponsor for purposes of providing notices to plan participants.&amp;nbsp;In no event will the relief granted extend beyond 1 year. &amp;nbsp;Fortunately, there are some helpful examples in the guidance: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;middot;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; If a qualified beneficiary, for example, would have been required to make a COBRA election by March 1, 2020, the Joint Notice delays that requirement until February 28, 2021, which is the earlier of 1 year from March 1, 2020, or the end of the Outbreak Period (which remains ongoing).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;middot;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; If a qualified beneficiary would have been required to make a COBRA election by March 1, 2021, the Joint Notice delays that election requirement until the earlier of 1 year from that date (i.e., March 1, 2022) or the end of the Outbreak Period. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;middot;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; If a plan would have been required to furnish a notice or disclosure by March 1, 2020, the relief under the Notices would end with respect to that notice or disclosure on February 28, 2021. The responsible plan fiduciary would be required to ensure that the notice or disclosure was furnished on or before March 1, 2021.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the guidance, the DOL recognizes that employers and participants may continue to face any number of challenges due to the ongoing nature of the pandemic and reminds that, &amp;ldquo;The guiding principle for administering employee benefit plans is to act reasonably, prudently, and in the interest of the workers and their families who rely on their health, retirement, and other employee benefit plans for their physical and economic well-being. This means that plan fiduciaries should make reasonable accommodations to prevent the loss of or undue delay in payment of benefits in such cases and should take steps to minimize the possibility of individuals losing benefits because of a failure to comply with pre-established time frames.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The DOL also suggests providing notification to plan participants in the following circumstances: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;middot;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Sending notice to individuals regarding the end of the relief period if the plan administrator should reasonably know that the end of the relief period for an individual action is exposing a participant or beneficiary to a risk of losing protections, benefits, or rights under the plan&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;middot;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Providing reissued or amended notices if original disclosures failed to provide accurate information regarding the time in which participants and beneficiaries were required to take action&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;middot;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Notifying participants and beneficiaries who are losing coverage under their group health plans that other coverage options may be available to them, including the opportunity to obtain coverage through the Health Insurance Marketplace &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;Conclusion&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As with the previous guidance, this new guidance will take some time to understand. In addition to providing additional notices, employers, third party administrators, and COBRA administrators may need to adjust their administrative practices.&amp;nbsp; We will continue to communicate the impacts of this guidance as we learn more. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: center;&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;Please contact your HORAN representatives for additional information.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: center;&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: center;&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: 13px;&quot;&gt;The information contained in this document is informational only and is not intended as, nor should it be construed as, legal or accounting advice. Neither HORAN nor its consultants provide legal, tax nor accounting advice of any kind. We make no legal representation, nor do we take legal responsibility of any kind regarding regulatory compliance. Please consult your counsel for a definitive interpretation of current statute and regulation, and their impact on you and your organization.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description> 
    <dc:creator>Shelly Hodges-Konys</dc:creator> 
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2021 09:23:00 GMT</pubDate> 
    <guid isPermaLink="false">f1397696-738c-4295-afcd-943feb885714:36772</guid> 
    
</item>
<item>
    <comments>https://health.horanassoc.com/health-compliance/blog/id/36720/irs-releases-guidance-for-fsa-relief-under-the-consolidated-appropriations-act#Comments</comments> 
    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> 
    <wfw:commentRss>https://health.horanassoc.com/DesktopModules/DnnForge%20-%20NewsArticles/RssComments.aspx?TabID=2479&amp;ModuleID=6073&amp;ArticleID=36720</wfw:commentRss> 
    <trackback:ping>https://health.horanassoc.com:443/DesktopModules/DnnForge%20-%20NewsArticles/Tracking/Trackback.aspx?ArticleID=36720&amp;PortalID=29&amp;TabID=2479</trackback:ping> 
    <title>IRS Releases Guidance for FSA Relief Under the Consolidated Appropriations Act</title> 
    <link>https://health.horanassoc.com/health-compliance/blog/id/36720/irs-releases-guidance-for-fsa-relief-under-the-consolidated-appropriations-act</link> 
    <description>&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;The wait is over! The IRS has finally issued clarifying guidance related to flexible spending account (FSA) relief provided under the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 (CAA) signed back in December. Our earlier post is available, &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.horanassoc.com/health-compliance/blog/id/36008/present-finally-arrives-for-flexible-spending-account-participants&quot;&gt;here.&lt;/a&gt; While the relief under the CAA was good news for employers and employees, it also raised a lot of questions. In particular, employers wanted to know more about the option to extend reimbursement from health FSAs through the end of the plan year when a participant ceases participation. Last week, the highly anticipated guidance was released in &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/n-21-15.pdf&quot;&gt;Notice 2021-15&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;This new guidance provides not only much needed clarification but gives great discretion to employers in the kind of relief they can choose to offer employees. The guidance allows employers the opportunity to balance the needs of its workforce with what makes sense from a practical administrative and operational perspective. As stated in our previous blog post, employers may provide some of the relief, all of the relief, or none of the relief and there are a few surprises in the guidance.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;Below is a breakdown of the FSA relief provided under the CAA and an overview of the guidance clarifying each component of that relief:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;Carryover of unspent account balances from 2020 into the 2021 plan year (and/or from 2021 into 2022)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;IRS guidance clarifies the following &amp;ndash;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;This relief is available to all FSAs (i.e., general health FSA, limited FSA, dependent&lt;span style=&quot;white-space: pre;&quot;&gt; &lt;/span&gt;care FSA).&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;Employers can allow carryover of all or part of participants&amp;rsquo; unused amounts.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;Employers may limit a carryover to apply only up to a specified date during the plan&lt;span style=&quot;white-space: pre;&quot;&gt; &lt;/span&gt;year and/or require employees to make a minimum election amount to access prior funds available &lt;span style=&quot;white-space: pre;&quot;&gt; &lt;/span&gt;for carryover.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;Employers can offer the relief on an employee-by-employee basis, thus allowing individuals &lt;span style=&quot;white-space: pre;&quot;&gt; &lt;/span&gt;to opt out to avoid losing HSA eligibility status. &lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;Amounts carried over into the subsequent plan year do not affect an employee&amp;rsquo;s election limit for such subsequent plan year.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;This increased carryover relief may be added regardless of whether a plan previously offered a carryover or a grace period (but an employer still may not provide both a carryover and a grace period).&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;Provide up to a 12-month grace period for unspent account balances at the end of 2020 and/or 2021&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;IRS guidance clarifies the following &amp;ndash;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;This relief is available to all FSAs (i.e., general health FSA, limited FSA, dependent care FSA).&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;Employers can limit the length of the grace period and are not required to provide full 12 months.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;An employer may amend its 2020 plan to offer an extended grace period even if the plan year is over (e.g., a calendar year Sec. 125 plan in 2020 with a health FSA may be amended now to offer an extended grace period to allow employees to apply the entire unused amounts remaining in their health FSAs as of December 31, 2020, to reimburse medical care expenses incurred through December 31, 2021).&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;Employers can offer the relief on an employee-by-employee basis, thus allowing individuals to opt out to avoid losing HSA eligibility status. &lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;The extended grace period may be allowed regardless of whether the plan previously offered a grace period or carryover (but again a plan may not provide both a carryover and a grace period).&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;Provide reimbursement from health FSAs through the end of the plan year in which participation ceases during the 2020 or 2021 calendar year &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;IRS guidance clarifies the following &amp;ndash;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;This health FSA spend down relief is available only to plans that offer the extended grace period, not the increased carryover.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;Employers may limit the amount available to terminated participants in the spend down period to only the amount contributed to the health FSA prior to termination of participation.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;Employers may the shorten the spend down period (i.e., not required to have it run through the end of the plan year).&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;This spend down period does not relieve the employer of its requirement to offer COBRA continuation coverage under the health FSA, if applicable (i.e., this limited extension of coverage does not prevent a loss of coverage that triggers a qualifying event). And, this relief is available even if the participant declines COBRA continuation. &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;Increase the Maximum Age Under Dependent Care FSAs from Age 12 to 13 for the 2021 Plan Year for Certain Employees&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;IRS guidance clarifies the following &amp;ndash; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;This special age limit relief is available only to employees who &amp;ndash;
    &lt;ul style=&quot;margin-left: 40px;&quot;&gt;
        &lt;li style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;Participated in the dependent care FSA for the last plan year for which the end of the enrollment period was on or before January 31, 2020 (e.g., for a calendar year plan this will be the 2020 plan year); and&lt;/li&gt;
        &lt;li style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;Have at least one dependent who attains age 13 either during the last plan year, or, in the case of an employee who (under this relief) has unused amounts for that plan year, during the subsequent plan year.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;/ul&gt;
    &lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;This relief is separate from the general carryover and extended claims period relief available under the CAA (i.e., an employer may adopt this special age limit relief and is not required to provide the increased carryover or extended grace period relief as well).&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;Employers may permit eligible employees to carry over all unused amounts from the first plan year to reimburse dependent care expenses during the subsequent plan year for a dependent that attained age 13 during the first plan year (until he/she attains age 14) and for a dependent who attains age 13 during the subsequent plan year. &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;Allow Prospective Mid-Year Election Changes to FSAs Without Requiring a Change in Status Event for Plan Years Ending in 2021&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;IRS guidance clarifies the following &amp;ndash; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;Employers can allow employees to make mid-year election changes to health FSAs (including limited FSAs) and dependent care FSAs without regard to any change in status. Changes an employer can allow include revoking an election, making one or more new elections (e.g., make an initial election if previously declined), or increasing/decreasing an existing election.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;Similar to previous relief, employers can also amend their Sec. 125 plans to allow employees to make prospective changes with their elections for employer-sponsored health coverage. Employers can amend their plans to permit employees to make a new election for health coverage (if the employee initially declined), revoke an existing election for coverage and make a new election to enroll in different health coverage sponsored by the employer (e.g., change from self-only to family coverage), and revoke an existing election for health coverage, provided that the employee attests in writing that he/she has enrolled or immediately will enroll in other comprehensive health coverage not provided by the employer (the Notice provides model language for the written attestation).&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;Employers may limit the period during which election changes may be made, the number of election changes they will permit, and the types of election changes that will be permitted. &lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;In regard to mid-year elections to revoke or decrease health FSA and/or dependent care FSA participation, employers may limit such election changes to amounts no less than amounts already reimbursed to employees.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;While salary reductions can only be made prospectively under a mid-year election change, employers may allow amounts contributed to a health FSA or dependent care FSA to be used for any eligible expenses incurred during the plan year before the employee made the election change. &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;Plan Amendments Needed to Implement Relief Provided Under the CAA&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;IRS guidance clarifies the following:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;While written plan amendments are required to implement any of the relief provided under the CAA, plans may be amended retroactively to the beginning of the applicable plan year if:&amp;nbsp;
    &lt;ul style=&quot;margin-left: 40px;&quot;&gt;
        &lt;li style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;The amendment is adopted no later than the last day of the first calendar year beginning after the end of the plan year in which the amendment is effective; and&lt;/li&gt;
        &lt;li style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;The plan is operated consistent with the terms of the amendment during the period beginning with the effective date of the amendment and ending on the date the amendment is adopted; and&lt;/li&gt;
        &lt;li style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;Employers clearly inform employees of the change(s).&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;/ul&gt;
    &lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;Plan amendments must specify which relief option (i.e., increased carryover or extended grace period) is adopted for the applicable plan years.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;If an employer adopts a plan amendment pursuant to the CAA and Notice 2021-15 that provides that the amendment supersedes normal plan operations for the duration of the relief period adopted by the plan, then the employer is not required to also delete an existing plan provision that provides for a $550 carryover (or 2 &amp;frac12; month grace period).
    &lt;ul style=&quot;margin-left: 40px;&quot;&gt;
        &lt;li style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;This allows, for example, an employer who wants to provide a health FSA spend down to &amp;ldquo;suspend&amp;rdquo; or &quot;pause&quot; its regular carryover feature and temporarily adopt an extended grace period (since plans that provide a carryover may not provide a health FSA spend down). After the temporary relief ends per the plan amendment, the plan&amp;rsquo;s regular carryover policy will once again apply.&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;/ul&gt;
    &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;In response to this new guidance, employers should immediately:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;Determine which portions of the relief they want to adopt (if any, and to what extent);&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;Work with their HORAN representative to determine which changes their FSA claims administrator can accommodate or will require additional time to make system changes; and&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;Communicate any changes clearly to plan participants. &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;Please contact your HORAN representative with any questions or for additional information.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: center;&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: 13px;&quot;&gt;The information contained in this document is informational only and is not intended as, nor should it be construed as, legal or accounting advice. Neither HORAN nor its consultants provide legal, tax nor accounting advice of any kind. We make no legal representation, nor do we take legal responsibility of any kind regarding regulatory compliance. Please consult your counsel for a definitive interpretation of current statute and regulation, and their impact on you and your organization.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: 13px;&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description> 
    <dc:creator>Rachel Pappenfus</dc:creator> 
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2021 04:07:00 GMT</pubDate> 
    <guid isPermaLink="false">f1397696-738c-4295-afcd-943feb885714:36720</guid> 
    
</item>
<item>
    <comments>https://health.horanassoc.com/health-compliance/blog/id/36101/a-look-back-at-2020-notable-changes-impacting-group-health-plans#Comments</comments> 
    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> 
    <wfw:commentRss>https://health.horanassoc.com/DesktopModules/DnnForge%20-%20NewsArticles/RssComments.aspx?TabID=2479&amp;ModuleID=6073&amp;ArticleID=36101</wfw:commentRss> 
    <trackback:ping>https://health.horanassoc.com:443/DesktopModules/DnnForge%20-%20NewsArticles/Tracking/Trackback.aspx?ArticleID=36101&amp;PortalID=29&amp;TabID=2479</trackback:ping> 
    <title>A Look Back at 2020: Notable Changes Impacting Group Health Plans                     </title> 
    <link>https://health.horanassoc.com/health-compliance/blog/id/36101/a-look-back-at-2020-notable-changes-impacting-group-health-plans</link> 
    <description>&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot;&gt;From dealing with a pandemic to murder hornets, 2020 is a year many of us are anxious to forget. But, before closing the door on this past year, it&amp;rsquo;s wise to pause and take a quick look back at the notable changes you might have missed in the flurry of activity at the end of the year. Those changes include:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;Additional Flexibility for Section 125 Plans Under Recent COVID Relief Bill&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/strong&gt;As we shared in our previous &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.horanassoc.com/health-compliance/blog/id/36008/present-finally-arrives-for-flexible-spending-account-participants&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;post&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, President Trump signed the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, shortly after Christmas. This bill permits employers to provide additional flexibility to Section 125 participants, including the option to carry over unspent account balances up to the full contribution amount from 2020 into the 2021 plan year (or from 2021 into 2022).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;Surprise Medical Billing&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;.&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; Another provision of the Consolidated Appropriations Act relates to rules set to begin in 2022, whereby individuals receiving emergency care or seeking services at &amp;nbsp;in-network hospitals and treated by out-of-network providers, without prior knowledge, can no longer be &amp;ldquo;balanced billed&amp;rdquo; for these surprise services without consent. Providers will have limited ability to charge for excess costs in these instances because the Act contains a dispute resolution procedure that requires binding arbitration to resolve conflicts between health plans and out-of-network providers that use median in-network rates as a guideline for payment. This portion of the law also includes new cost estimate and price transparency provisions. More guidance on this will be forthcoming over the course of the year.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;Required Coverage of COVID Vaccines at 100%&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;.&lt;/strong&gt; COVID vaccines began rolling out in December so as a reminder, under the &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/11/06/2020-24332/additional-policy-and-regulatory-revisions-in-response-to-the-covid-19-public-health-emergency&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;interim final rule&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; issued this fall, non-grandfathered health plans must cover the vaccines at no cost, regardless of whether they are administered by in-network providers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;Transparency Rule&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;.&lt;/strong&gt;&amp;nbsp; The final rule released this fall includes two types of disclosure requirements to help individuals estimate the cost for health care prior to receiving treatment. The first disclosure requirement (public disclosures) applies to plan years beginning on or after&lt;strong&gt; &lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;January 1, 2022&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; and involves having three &amp;ldquo;machine-readable files&amp;rdquo; posted on an internet website and updated on a monthly basis. The three files must provide: 1) information on negotiated rates for all in-network covered items and services; 2) information regarding charges from, and payments to, out-of-network providers; and 3) information regarding in-network prescription drug pricing. Guidance to help plans ensure their files will be in compliance is pending.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot;&gt;The second type (individual disclosures), involves disclosing specific information regarding a covered item or service and must be available to participants, beneficiaries, and enrollees. For plan years beginning on or after &lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;January 1, 2023&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;, an initial list of 500 specified items and services must be available. Information regarding all other specified items and services must be disclosed for plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2024. Finalized model language is pending.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot;&gt;These disclosure requirements apply to most non-grandfathered group health plans (self-funded and fully-insured) and health insurance issuers. For more information, the CMS fact sheet regarding this final rule can be viewed &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.cms.gov/newsroom/fact-sheets/transparency-coverage-final-rule-fact-sheet-cms-9915-f&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;here&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;Greater Flexibility for Grandfathered Health Plans&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;. &lt;/strong&gt;Proposed rules providing grandfathered health plans greater flexibility under the Affordable Care Act were finalized in December with no substantive changes. Specifically, the final rules allow grandfathered plans to make two new permitted changes without losing their grandfathered status. First, a grandfathered high deductible health plan (HDHP) can change fixed-amount cost-sharing requirements so long as the changes are necessary to comply with HDHP requirements under the Internal Revenue Code. Second, the rules amend the definition of &amp;ldquo;maximum percentage increase&amp;rdquo; to provide an additional method for determining permitted increases in fixed cost-sharing amounts. Under the expanded definition, a plan may use the current standard (i.e., the &amp;ldquo;medical inflation&amp;rdquo; amount published by the DOL) or an alternative standard (i.e., the &amp;ldquo;premium adjustment percentage&amp;rdquo; published annually by HHS) if it yields a higher-dollar value. The &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/12/15/2020-27498/grandfathered-group-health-plans-and-grandfathered-group-health-insurance-coverage&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;final rules&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; apply to grandfathered group health plans and grandfathered group health insurance coverage beginning on&lt;strong&gt; &lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;June 15, 2021&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;HSA and FSA Annual Contribution Limits for 2021&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/strong&gt;For calendar year 2021, the health flexible spending account (FSA) contribution limit remains at $2,750 (no increase from 2020). The dependent care FSA limits also remain unchanged at $5,000 and $2,500, for individuals or married couples filing jointly, and married individuals filing separately, respectively.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot;&gt;The 2021 contribution limits for health savings accounts (HSAs) are $3,600 for self-only coverage under an HDHP (increase from $3,550 for 2020), and $7,200 for family coverage under an HDHP (increase from $7,100 for 2020). The HSA catch-up contribution limit for individuals aged 55 or older remains unchanged at $1,000.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;2021 Indexed PCORI Fee Amount&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/strong&gt;Insurers and sponsors of self-funded health plans are required to report and pay fees on an annual basis to fund the federal Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) trust fund. Early last month, the IRS released &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/n-20-84.pdf&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Notice 2020-84&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; which provides the adjusted PCORI fee for plan years that end between October 1, 2020 and October 1, 2021. The new fee required to be reported and paid on IRS Form 720 is $2.66 per covered life (an increase from $2.54 for 2020).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot;&gt;Now that you&amp;rsquo;re largely up to date on current benefits issues, you can feel confident moving forward in 2021! For questions or additional information, please contact your HORAN account representative.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: 13px;&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;The information contained in this document is informational only and is not intended as, nor should it be construed as, legal or accounting advice. Neither HORAN nor its consultants provide legal, tax nor accounting advice of any kind. We make no legal representation, nor do we take legal responsibility of any kind regarding regulatory compliance. Please consult your counsel for a definitive interpretation of current statute and regulation, and their impact on you and your organization.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description> 
    <dc:creator>Rachel Pappenfus</dc:creator> 
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2021 06:30:00 GMT</pubDate> 
    <guid isPermaLink="false">f1397696-738c-4295-afcd-943feb885714:36101</guid> 
    
</item>
<item>
    <comments>https://health.horanassoc.com/health-compliance/blog/id/36008/present-finally-arrives-for-flexible-spending-account-participants#Comments</comments> 
    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> 
    <wfw:commentRss>https://health.horanassoc.com/DesktopModules/DnnForge%20-%20NewsArticles/RssComments.aspx?TabID=2479&amp;ModuleID=6073&amp;ArticleID=36008</wfw:commentRss> 
    <trackback:ping>https://health.horanassoc.com:443/DesktopModules/DnnForge%20-%20NewsArticles/Tracking/Trackback.aspx?ArticleID=36008&amp;PortalID=29&amp;TabID=2479</trackback:ping> 
    <title>Present Finally Arrives for Flexible Spending Account Participants</title> 
    <link>https://health.horanassoc.com/health-compliance/blog/id/36008/present-finally-arrives-for-flexible-spending-account-participants</link> 
    <description>&lt;p&gt;Much like many individuals who experienced shipping delays waiting for packages that didn&amp;rsquo;t arrive in time for Christmas, employers and employees have been waiting to see if there would be additional relief for flexible spending account (FSA) participants.&amp;nbsp; The wait is over and the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, was signed by President Trump on December 27&lt;sup&gt;th&lt;/sup&gt;.&amp;nbsp; While there is a lot to uncover in the 5,000 plus piece of legislation, this post focuses on temporary FSA relief that employers may adopt. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Section 125 rules generally require that FSA elections made during the plan year are irrevocable, unless an employee experiences a qualifying mid-year change event (e.g., a change in status that results in a corresponding change in eligibility). Further, elections are generally use-it or lose-it.&amp;nbsp; Account balances not used by the end of the plan year, unless subject to carryover or 2 &amp;frac12; month grace period, are forfeited by the participant and retained by the plan and applied to the costs of administering the plan. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The new relief under the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, allows employers to amend their plans to: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Allow employees to make a prospective mid-year election change without requiring a change in status event during the 2021 plan year;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Let employees carry over unspent account balances up to the full contribution amount from 2020 into the 2021 plan year (or from 2021 into 2022);&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Provide up to a 12-month grace period for unspent account balances at the end of 2020 or 2021;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Extend reimbursement from health FSAs through the end of the plan year in which a participant ceased participation in the plan during the 2020 or 2021 calendar year; and&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Increase the maximum age under dependent care FSAs from 12 to 13 for the 2021 plan year.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Similar to previous relief, employers may adopt some of the changes, all of the changes or none of the changes under their plans.&amp;nbsp; Employers may adopt changes now and amend their plans by the end of the subsequent calendar year as long as they operate the plan consistently.&amp;nbsp; It will be important for employers to understand what flexibility their claims administrator can allow &amp;ndash; not all claim systems will be able to accommodate the relief. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It is also important for employers to remember that cash outs of unused contributions and retroactive election changes are still prohibited under Section 125 rules and that extended coverage under a health FSA grace period may impact eligibility to contribute to a health savings account (HSA).&amp;nbsp; Employees that participate in a health FSA with a rollover provision,&amp;nbsp; a grace period, or are offered an extended coverage period are ineligible to make HSA contributions for the duration of the coverage period (unless the health FSA is HSA compatible or amended to be HSA compatible). &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In response to this additional FSA relief employers should: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Determine which portions of the relief they intend to adopt (if any);&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Work with their HORAN representative to determine which changes their FSA claims administrator can accommodate or will require additional time to make system changes; and&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Communicate any changes clearly to plan participants. &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Please contact your HORAN representative with any questions or for additional information.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: center;&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: 13px;&quot;&gt;The information contained in this document is informational only and is not intended as, nor should it be construed as, legal or accounting advice. Neither HORAN nor its consultants provide legal, tax nor accounting advice of any kind. We make no legal representation, nor do we take legal responsibility of any kind regarding regulatory compliance. Please consult your counsel for a definitive interpretation of current statute and regulation, and their impact on you and your organization.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description> 
    <dc:creator>Rachel Pappenfus</dc:creator> 
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2020 15:20:00 GMT</pubDate> 
    <guid isPermaLink="false">f1397696-738c-4295-afcd-943feb885714:36008</guid> 
    
</item>
<item>
    <comments>https://health.horanassoc.com/health-compliance/blog/id/35475/clearing-the-smoke-on-outcome-based-wellness-programs#Comments</comments> 
    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> 
    <wfw:commentRss>https://health.horanassoc.com/DesktopModules/DnnForge%20-%20NewsArticles/RssComments.aspx?TabID=2479&amp;ModuleID=6073&amp;ArticleID=35475</wfw:commentRss> 
    <trackback:ping>https://health.horanassoc.com:443/DesktopModules/DnnForge%20-%20NewsArticles/Tracking/Trackback.aspx?ArticleID=35475&amp;PortalID=29&amp;TabID=2479</trackback:ping> 
    <title>Clearing the Smoke on Outcome-Based Wellness Programs</title> 
    <link>https://health.horanassoc.com/health-compliance/blog/id/35475/clearing-the-smoke-on-outcome-based-wellness-programs</link> 
    <description>&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;Annual enrollment is the time of year when employers often look to make changes in their plan designs and the contribution employees pay for group health plan coverage. One of the changes often under consideration is a smoking cessation incentive in the form of premium differential for employees that smoke versus those that do not or choose to quit. What employers sometimes fail to recognize is that it must be done through an employer-sponsored wellness program to be compliant. In this post, we help clear some of the confusion surrounding smoking cessation programs by briefly looking at some common considerations. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;First, it is important to understand that when an employer requires an employee to be a non-smoker in order to receive an incentive, the program is considered &amp;ldquo;outcome-based&amp;rdquo; under the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). This is because the program requires an employee to achieve a health outcome (e.g., being smoke-free) in order to receive the reward.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;Next, it is important for employers to consider how they will determine which employees are smokers and which are non-smokers. There are generally two ways an employer may make that determination: 1) employee affidavit, or 2) biometric testing for tobacco use. Depending on whether an employer chooses to test employees for nicotine or simply require that employees sign affidavits, different laws and regulations apply. Employers requiring signed affidavits will need to comply with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) and the Affordable Care Act. While employers choosing to test individuals will have to comply with HIPAA and the Americans with Disabilities Act.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;Knowing which laws and regulations apply is important because they determine, for example, the amount of the incentive that may be rewarded, and the kinds of notices and disclosures that must be provided to employee plan participants. Regardless of whether employers will require an affidavit or a nicotine test, one thing that applies to both is that an outcome-based program must &amp;ndash;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;Offer a reasonable alternative standard (RAS) that is activity based (e.g., completing a certain number of smoking cessation classes) to anyone that does not meet the health outcome (e.g. being a non-smoker); and&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;Provide the full amount of the reward/incentive to any participants that complete the RAS.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;Employers often want to prorate a reward for individuals that complete the RAS mid-plan year, but prorating the incentive is strictly prohibited under HIPAA. In general, HIPAA limits rewards for outcome-based programs to 30% of the employee-only premium (if only employees are eligible to participate) and up to 50% of the premium when the health factor is tobacco use. However, the ADA rules also apply when an employer collects health information through biometric testing. Currently, incentives issued by the EEOC, the enforcement arm of the ADA, have been vacated but new guidance is expected soon.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;Finally, employers should consider the federal tax implications of their programs&amp;rsquo; reward(s) when designing a wellness program. Cash or cash-equivalent rewards (e.g., gift cards) are always taxable, no matter the amount. In contrast, employer contributions to a health savings account (HSA), reduced major medical premiums, and benefits and services that are medical care (e.g., health risk assessment) are generally not subject to taxation. For example, an employer wanting to incentivize its employees to participate in a smoking cessation program with a tax-free reward could offer the incentive of lower medical premiums to those that sign the &amp;ldquo;tobacco-free&amp;rdquo; affidavit or complete the (activity-based) reasonable alternative that requires attending six smoking cessation classes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;Because different rules apply depending on the design of a smoking cessation program, careful consideration is required to ensure compliance. Employers should keep in mind the following:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;1.&amp;nbsp; Wellness programs can be more complex than they might seem because there are multiple pieces of legislation that might apply and multiple ways to determine which employees are smokers and which employees are nonsmokers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;2.&amp;nbsp; Plan design matters because it impacts which rules apply and the amount of any applicable incentive.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;3.&amp;nbsp; Employers cannot require employees to be tobacco-free without also providing employees a RAS in order to receive the reward.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;Want more information regarding wellness program designs? Tune in to tomorrow&amp;rsquo;s &amp;ldquo;Wellness Wednesday&amp;rdquo; at 9 a.m. EST when HORAN&amp;rsquo;s Health Management Team presents, &amp;ldquo;Carrot vs the stick&amp;hellip;. What works best?&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;For any questions or additional information, you can also contact your HORAN account representative.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: justify;&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: 13px;&quot;&gt;The information contained in this document is informational only and is not intended as, nor should it be construed as, legal or accounting advice. Neither HORAN nor its consultants provide legal, tax nor accounting advice of any kind. We make no legal representation, nor do we take legal responsibility of any kind regarding regulatory compliance. Please consult your counsel for a definitive interpretation of current statute and regulation, and their impact on you and your organization.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description> 
    <dc:creator>Rachel Pappenfus</dc:creator> 
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2020 00:45:00 GMT</pubDate> 
    <guid isPermaLink="false">f1397696-738c-4295-afcd-943feb885714:35475</guid> 
    
</item>
<item>
    <comments>https://health.horanassoc.com/health-compliance/blog/id/34205/irs-releases-final-2020-aca-reporting-forms-instructions-and-penalties#Comments</comments> 
    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> 
    <wfw:commentRss>https://health.horanassoc.com/DesktopModules/DnnForge%20-%20NewsArticles/RssComments.aspx?TabID=2479&amp;ModuleID=6073&amp;ArticleID=34205</wfw:commentRss> 
    <trackback:ping>https://health.horanassoc.com:443/DesktopModules/DnnForge%20-%20NewsArticles/Tracking/Trackback.aspx?ArticleID=34205&amp;PortalID=29&amp;TabID=2479</trackback:ping> 
    <title>IRS Releases Final 2020 ACA Reporting Forms, Instructions and Penalties</title> 
    <link>https://health.horanassoc.com/health-compliance/blog/id/34205/irs-releases-final-2020-aca-reporting-forms-instructions-and-penalties</link> 
    <description>&lt;p&gt;Late last week, the IRS released the finalized Affordable Care Act (ACA) reporting forms for calendar year 2020 and the final instructions. Below is a snapshot of what employers need to know. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;Final Reporting Forms&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In our last &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.horanassoc.com/health-compliance/blog/id/34064/sharing-the-gift-of-new-aca-reporting-forms-penalties-transition-relief&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;post&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, we discussed the recently issued 2020 draft reporting forms. The IRS has now released the final forms which may be viewed by clicking on the links below:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f1094b.pdf&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Final 2020 Form 1094-B&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f1095b.pdf&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Final 2020 Form 1095-B&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f1094c.pdf&quot;&gt;Final 2020 Form 1094-C&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/f1095c.pdf&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Final 2020 Form 1095-C&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;Final Instructions and New Reporting Penalty Amounts&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The IRS has also released the final instructions for completing the 2020 reporting forms. There are a couple of notable changes when comparing the final 2020 instructions to those for 2019. First, the instructions now require an applicable large employer (ALE) to provide the plan start month on Form 1095-C (this was optional in the past). Second, the instructions now provide how to report individuals who were offered an individual coverage health reimbursement arrangement (ICHRA).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The final instructions also present the new penalty amounts for failing to report correct information. For 2020, the penalty amount for providing an incorrect information return or payee statement has been increased to $280 (previously $270) for each incorrect return or statement. The total penalty amount has also been increased, now not to exceed $3,392,000. This penalty cap was previously $3,339,000 for 2019.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The final instructions for the reporting forms are available below:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-prior/i109495b--2020.pdf&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Final 2020 Instructions for Forms 1094 &amp;amp; 1095-B&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/i109495c.pdf&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Final 2020 Instructions for Forms 1094 &amp;amp; 1095-C&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Please contact your HORAN account representative for any questions or additional information.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;em&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: 13px;&quot;&gt;The information contained in this document is informational only and is not intended as, nor should it be construed as, legal or accounting advice. Neither HORAN nor its consultants provide legal, tax nor accounting advice of any kind. We make no legal representation, nor do we take legal responsibility of any kind regarding regulatory compliance. Please consult your counsel for a definitive interpretation of current statute and regulation, and their impact on you and your organization.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description> 
    <dc:creator>Rachel Pappenfus</dc:creator> 
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2020 18:38:00 GMT</pubDate> 
    <guid isPermaLink="false">f1397696-738c-4295-afcd-943feb885714:34205</guid> 
    
</item>
<item>
    <comments>https://health.horanassoc.com/health-compliance/blog/id/34064/sharing-the-gift-of-new-aca-reporting-forms-penalties-transition-relief#Comments</comments> 
    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> 
    <wfw:commentRss>https://health.horanassoc.com/DesktopModules/DnnForge%20-%20NewsArticles/RssComments.aspx?TabID=2479&amp;ModuleID=6073&amp;ArticleID=34064</wfw:commentRss> 
    <trackback:ping>https://health.horanassoc.com:443/DesktopModules/DnnForge%20-%20NewsArticles/Tracking/Trackback.aspx?ArticleID=34064&amp;PortalID=29&amp;TabID=2479</trackback:ping> 
    <title>Sharing the Gift of New ACA Reporting Forms, Penalties, &amp; Transition Relief!</title> 
    <link>https://health.horanassoc.com/health-compliance/blog/id/34064/sharing-the-gift-of-new-aca-reporting-forms-penalties-transition-relief</link> 
    <description>&lt;p&gt;Christmas is less than 80 days away&amp;hellip; Seriously, where has this year gone?!? While it&amp;rsquo;s hard to believe, December 25&lt;sup&gt;th&lt;/sup&gt; is right around the corner. This means Affordable Care Act (ACA) reporting is also quickly approaching. We know thinking about ACA requirements may not bring the same excitement as seeing presents under the tree, but our hope is to help lessen any stress by gifting an understanding of the latest news on ACA reporting.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In a previous &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.horanassoc.com/health-compliance/blog/id/33358/aca-affordability-percentage-increases-for-2021&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;post&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, we announced that the IRS raised the ACA affordability percentage for 2021. This post serves as a follow up, looking at the new employer mandate penalties for 2021; the 2020 draft reporting forms; and IRS Notice 2020-76 (released just last week) that provides transition relief for health coverage reporting for 2020.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As a reminder, under the ACA, an Applicable Large Employer (ALE) (one with 50 or more full-time employees during the previous year (including full-time equivalent employees)) is required to either offer affordable minimum essential coverage that provides minimum value to its full-time employees and dependents, or potentially pay an employer shared responsibility payment (a penalty). Each year, ALEs are required to report to the IRS whether coverage was offered, and whether the coverage satisfied the affordability and minimum value standards. Certain small employers have annual reporting requirements as well.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;2021 Employer Mandate Penalties&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The employer mandate penalties are increased annually to reflect an inflationary adjustment. There are two types of penalties related to reporting requirements under the ACA. Per Section 4980H(a), the &amp;ldquo;A Penalty&amp;rdquo; is imposed when an ALE fails to offer minimum essential coverage to at least 95% of its full-time employees. Per Section 4980H(b), the &amp;ldquo;B Penalty&amp;rdquo; is imposed when an ALE offers coverage, but the coverage is not affordable or does not provide minimum value (i.e., does not pay at least 60% of the total allowed cost of benefits). The penalties for 2021 are as follows:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;A Penalty&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;: Penalty amount equals &lt;strong&gt;$2,700&lt;/strong&gt; (increased from $2,570 for 2020) for each full-time employee, minus the first 30 employees. When determining the penalty amount, ALL full-time employees must be counted (even those who have minimum essential coverage), except for the first 30 employees that can be excluded.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;B Penalty&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;: Penalty amount equals &lt;strong&gt;$4,060&lt;/strong&gt; (increased from $3,860 for 2020) for each full-time employee who receives the premium tax credit.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;2020 Coverage Reporting (Filing in 2021)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Each year, ALEs are required to issue two reports regarding the minimum essential coverage offered to employees &amp;ndash; one to the IRS (Form 1094-C) and one to individuals (Form 1095-C). Similarly, small self-funded employers (with less than 50 full-time employees (including full-time equivalent employees)) are required to report participant enrollment in coverage on Forms 1094-B and 1095-B.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The IRS has released the 2020 draft reporting forms for review. Comparing the 2019 Forms to the 2020 Draft Forms, no changes were made to the &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-dft/f1094c--dft.pdf&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;2020 Draft Form 1094-C&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. Changes were made to Draft Form 1095-C. This is in response to the final rule issued last summer, applicable to plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2020, that permits employers to reimburse employees for qualified health insurance costs (e.g., premiums for individual health coverage purchased through the Marketplace) via an Individual Coverage Health Reimbursement Arrangement (ICHRA) if certain conditions are met.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Changes to the &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-dft/f1095c--dft.pdf&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;2020 Draft Form 1095-C&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; include a new Line 17 in which to provide the monthly Zip Code used by the employer for determining affordability if the employee was offered an ICHRA. New codes have also been added to report the location used by the employer when determining the affordability of coverage (i.e., the employee&amp;rsquo;s primary residence or work site). In addition, the form now provides a space to enter the employee&amp;rsquo;s age.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;No changes were made to the &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-dft/f1094b--dft.pdf&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;2020 Draft Form 1094-B&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. However, just as the Draft 1095-C has been updated to capture whether the employee or other individuals were covered by an ICHRA, the &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-dft/f1095b--dft.pdf&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;2020 Draft Form 1095-B&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt; has similarly been revised to include a new coverage code.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While it is helpful for employers to review the 2020 Draft Forms, they cannot be used or relied upon for filing. Further, the IRS warns that additional changes may be made before releasing the finalized forms. As of the publishing of this post, the instructions to complete the forms and the penalty amounts for failing to comply with the reporting requirements have not yet been released.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;IRS Notice 2020-76&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;IRS &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/n-20-76.pdf&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Notice 2020-76&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;, released on October 2&lt;sup&gt;nd&lt;/sup&gt;, gives employers some relief by extending the deadline to furnish &lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;2020 Forms&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt; &lt;strong&gt;1095-B and 1095-C to individuals&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/span&gt;. The new due date is &lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;March 2, 2021&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;, extended from January 31, 2021. Employers will not be permitted to further extend this deadline.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;No extension has been granted to employers for purposes of submitting the &lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;2020 Forms to the IRS&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt; (i.e., 1094-B, 1094-C, and copies of 1095-B or 1095-C). This means the forms must be submitted &lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;on or before March 1, 2021 (or March 31, 2021 (if filing electronically))&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;. An extension for filing these forms is available by submitting Form 8809.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Additionally, Notice 2020-76 extends furnishing relief to small self-funded employers by providing that the IRS will not impose a penalty for failure to distribute Form 1095-B to individuals if certain conditions are met.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For any questions or additional information, please contact your HORAN account representative.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: 13px;&quot;&gt;The information contained in this document is informational only and is not intended as, nor should it be construed as, legal or accounting advice. Neither HORAN nor its consultants provide legal, tax nor accounting advice of any kind. We make no legal representation, nor do we take legal responsibility of any kind regarding regulatory compliance. Please consult your counsel for a definitive interpretation of current statute and regulation, and their impact on you and your organization.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description> 
    <dc:creator>Rachel Pappenfus</dc:creator> 
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2020 14:30:00 GMT</pubDate> 
    <guid isPermaLink="false">f1397696-738c-4295-afcd-943feb885714:34064</guid> 
    
</item>
<item>
    <comments>https://health.horanassoc.com/health-compliance/blog/id/33805/ghosts-and-goblins-are-scary-employer-medicare-part-d-requirements-dont-have-to-be#Comments</comments> 
    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> 
    <wfw:commentRss>https://health.horanassoc.com/DesktopModules/DnnForge%20-%20NewsArticles/RssComments.aspx?TabID=2479&amp;ModuleID=6073&amp;ArticleID=33805</wfw:commentRss> 
    <trackback:ping>https://health.horanassoc.com:443/DesktopModules/DnnForge%20-%20NewsArticles/Tracking/Trackback.aspx?ArticleID=33805&amp;PortalID=29&amp;TabID=2479</trackback:ping> 
    <title>Ghosts and Goblins are Scary, Employer Medicare Part D Requirements Don’t Have to be…</title> 
    <link>https://health.horanassoc.com/health-compliance/blog/id/33805/ghosts-and-goblins-are-scary-employer-medicare-part-d-requirements-dont-have-to-be</link> 
    <description>&lt;p&gt;It&amp;rsquo;s that time of year! The leaves are changing, the days are getting shorter, and (for better or for worse) pumpkin spice everything is hitting the shelves! Halloween is right around the corner which means the deadline to provide Medicare Part D notices is quickly approaching, but you don&amp;rsquo;t have to be scared or spooked. This blog post will help you understand what employer plan sponsors need to know to comply. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Each year employers must disclose whether the prescription drug coverage they offer is creditable or non-creditable to Medicare eligible participants before the Medicare annual enrollment period which begins on October 15&lt;sup&gt;th&lt;/sup&gt;. &amp;ldquo;Creditable&amp;rdquo; means the actuarial value of the coverage is expected to be (on average) equal to or greater than Medicare&amp;rsquo;s standard prescription drug coverage. This information is important because if individuals fail to enroll in Part D or other creditable coverage when first eligible (and for a continuous period of 63 days or more), they will have to pay higher premiums on a permanent basis when they do enroll in Part D coverage.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;From a practical standpoint, employers don&amp;rsquo;t always know which individuals are &amp;ldquo;Medicare eligible.&amp;rdquo; For this reason, &amp;ldquo;best practice&amp;rdquo; is to provide the annual notice to all individuals enrolled or seeking to enroll in the employers&amp;rsquo; plans to ensure compliance. Because the annual Medicare enrollment period runs from October 15 through December 7, employers must distribute notices &lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;no later than October 14, 2020&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;. Other times employers are required to provide a Medicare Part D notice include:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Before an individual&amp;rsquo;s initial Medicare enrollment period;&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Before the effective date of coverage for Medicare eligible individuals that enroll in the employer&amp;rsquo;s prescription drug coverage;&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Whenever any change occurs affecting the &amp;ldquo;creditable&amp;rdquo; status of the coverage or the employer ceases to provide prescription drug coverage; and&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Upon request.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An employer is considered to have met the requirement to provide a notice before an individual&amp;rsquo;s initial enrollment period if they provide the notice to all eligible participants at least once per year. This is another reason providing the notice to all employees prior to the Medicare annual enrollment period is a good idea.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Employers are required to disclose the creditable status for the plan currently in place.&amp;nbsp; This creates some confusion for employers who are also holding their plan&amp;rsquo;s annual enrollment period.&amp;nbsp; While a literal interpretation of federal regulations might require the employer to send a notice both prior to the Medicare open enrollment period and again if the creditable status of the plan changes, it is likely that providing a single combined notice would suffice.&amp;nbsp; Employers that wish to provide a single, combined Medicare Part D Notice should include i) the status of the &lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;current&lt;/span&gt; plan in place (i.e., for 2020); ii) how the plan is changing; and iii) the effective date of the change (i.e., for 2021).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In addition to notifying individuals, employers must report the status of their drug coverage each year to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;No later than 60 days after the start of the plan year;&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Within 30 days of termination of the prescription drug plan; and&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Within 30 days of a change impacting the creditable status of the plan.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Disclosure of a plan&amp;rsquo;s status to CMS can be completed &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Prescription-Drug-Coverage/CreditableCoverage/CCDisclosureForm&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: center;&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;For questions or additional information, please contact your HORAN account representative.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: left;&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: 13px;&quot;&gt;The information contained in this document is informational only and is not intended as, nor should it be construed as, legal or accounting advice. Neither HORAN nor its consultants provide legal, tax nor accounting advice of any kind. We make no legal representation nor do we take legal responsibility of any kind regarding regulatory compliance. Please consult your counsel for a definitive interpretation of current statute and regulation and their impact on you and your organization.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: center;&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: center;&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: center;&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description> 
    <dc:creator>Rachel Pappenfus</dc:creator> 
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2020 13:15:00 GMT</pubDate> 
    <guid isPermaLink="false">f1397696-738c-4295-afcd-943feb885714:33805</guid> 
    
</item>
<item>
    <comments>https://health.horanassoc.com/health-compliance/blog/id/33358/aca-affordability-percentage-increases-for-2021#Comments</comments> 
    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> 
    <wfw:commentRss>https://health.horanassoc.com/DesktopModules/DnnForge%20-%20NewsArticles/RssComments.aspx?TabID=2479&amp;ModuleID=6073&amp;ArticleID=33358</wfw:commentRss> 
    <trackback:ping>https://health.horanassoc.com:443/DesktopModules/DnnForge%20-%20NewsArticles/Tracking/Trackback.aspx?ArticleID=33358&amp;PortalID=29&amp;TabID=2479</trackback:ping> 
    <title>ACA Affordability Percentage Increases for 2021</title> 
    <link>https://health.horanassoc.com/health-compliance/blog/id/33358/aca-affordability-percentage-increases-for-2021</link> 
    <description>&lt;p&gt;As the summer starts to wind down, it&amp;rsquo;s easy slip into a &amp;ldquo;set it and forget it&amp;rdquo; mindset especially when it comes to compliance with the Affordable Care Act (ACA). Let&amp;rsquo;s face it, the ACA isn&amp;rsquo;t new. But, as many employers finalize renewal strategies and plan for 2020, it makes sense to check in on ACA compliance - especially the employer shared responsibility provisions.&amp;nbsp; More specifically, employers should determine whether their offer of coverage to employees is considered affordable or not. Employers that fail to evaluate their contribution strategies could face penalties if an employee&amp;rsquo;s offer of coverage is unaffordable and that employee enrolls in marketplace coverage and receives a subsidy. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Last month, the IRS released &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/rp-20-36.pdf&quot;&gt;Revenue Procedure 2020-36&lt;/a&gt;, announcing the ACA affordability percentage for 2021 will be 9.83% of household income.&amp;nbsp; For 2021, the cost of single coverage must be less than 9.83% of an employee&amp;rsquo;s household income in order to be affordable.&amp;nbsp; This is up from the 2019 affordability percentage of 9.78%, but still not back to the 2018 percentage which was 9.86%. The increase in affordability percentage means that employers may be able to increase their employee contributions in 2021 for their lowest cost self-only coverage option and still meet one of the affordability safe harbors.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As a reminder, because employee household income is generally unknown to employers, the IRS provides employers the opportunity to protect themselves from inadvertent penalty by way of three safe harbors when determining affordability:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Federal Poverty Level&lt;/strong&gt;: To determine affordable coverage under the Federal Poverty Level safe harbor, the employee&amp;rsquo;s contribution for the lowest-cost self-only coverage that provides minimum value cannot exceed 9.83% of the Federal Poverty Level set each calendar year by The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). The current poverty level is $12,760 &amp;ndash; the maximum contribution for an employer using the Federal Poverty Level safe harbor for 2021 is $104.53 (up from $101.79 in 2020).&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Rate of Pay&lt;/strong&gt;: This test bases affordability on an employee&amp;rsquo;s rate of pay. For an hourly employee, the contribution for the lowest-cost, self-only coverage that provides minimum value cannot exceed 9.83% of the employee&amp;rsquo;s hourly rate of pay multiplied by 130 hours per month.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Form W-2 (Box 1)&lt;/strong&gt;: Coverage is deemed affordable for 2021 if an employee&amp;rsquo;s premium contribution for the lowest-cost, self-only coverage that provides minimum value does not exceed 9.83% of the employee&amp;rsquo;s Box 1 wages on Form W-2 in the 2021 taxable year.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The IRS has not yet announced the 2021 penalty amounts, but we know the amounts are not likely to decrease.&amp;nbsp; The 2020 penalty for employers that do not offer affordable, minimum value coverage is $3,860 per employee that enrolls in exchange coverage and qualifies for assistance.&amp;nbsp; If you have questions about whether your coverage is affordable, please contact your HORAN representative for assistance.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description> 
    <dc:creator>Shelly Hodges-Konys</dc:creator> 
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2020 00:04:00 GMT</pubDate> 
    <guid isPermaLink="false">f1397696-738c-4295-afcd-943feb885714:33358</guid> 
    
</item>
<item>
    <comments>https://health.horanassoc.com/health-compliance/blog/id/32863/sex-discrimination-and-group-health-plans-aca-nondiscrimination-and-supreme-court-bostock-decision#Comments</comments> 
    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> 
    <wfw:commentRss>https://health.horanassoc.com/DesktopModules/DnnForge%20-%20NewsArticles/RssComments.aspx?TabID=2479&amp;ModuleID=6073&amp;ArticleID=32863</wfw:commentRss> 
    <trackback:ping>https://health.horanassoc.com:443/DesktopModules/DnnForge%20-%20NewsArticles/Tracking/Trackback.aspx?ArticleID=32863&amp;PortalID=29&amp;TabID=2479</trackback:ping> 
    <title>Sex Discrimination and Group Health Plans: ACA Nondiscrimination and Supreme Court Bostock Decision</title> 
    <link>https://health.horanassoc.com/health-compliance/blog/id/32863/sex-discrimination-and-group-health-plans-aca-nondiscrimination-and-supreme-court-bostock-decision</link> 
    <description>&lt;p&gt;Much like having a lukewarm dinner date, employers find themselves in the position to try to interpret mixed signals on where to go from here when it comes to discrimination on the basis of gender in group health plans. HHS and the Supreme Court have taken different positions on the meaning of &amp;ldquo;sex&amp;rdquo; over the last few weeks. Employers would be wise to re-examine their benefit plans for any potential risk. &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Section 1557 of the ACA prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, or disability in health activities and programs that receive federal funding from HHS. HHS issued regulations on this new rule in 2016.&amp;nbsp; While the rule&amp;nbsp; and regulations did not directly apply to many group health plans, the rules garnered attention because they proffered that discrimination on the basis of sex not only includes gender, but sex stereotyping and gender identity providing that medically appropriate services could not be denied based on the participant&amp;rsquo;s sex or gender identity.&amp;nbsp; Many insurers and self-funded plans removed exclusions from their plans in response. However, in December 2016, the day before the rules were to go into effect, a federal court in Texas issued a nationwide injunction prohibiting the enforcement of the portion of the regulation requiring group health plans to cover gender dysphoria services.&amp;nbsp; The court&#39;s finding was that HHS overreached its authority in its interpretation. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In response to this decision, HHS issued regulations in June that significantly rolled back the reach of the ACA&amp;rsquo;s nondiscrimination provisions.&amp;nbsp; Specifically, as it relates to the meaning of &amp;ldquo;sex,&amp;rdquo; HHS indicated that it would return to the government&amp;rsquo;s interpretation of &amp;ldquo;sex.&amp;rdquo;&amp;nbsp; Government interpretation is the plain meaning of the word &amp;ndash; &amp;ldquo;male&amp;rdquo; or &amp;ldquo;female&amp;rdquo; as determined by biology.&amp;nbsp; Because the final rules also eliminate all definitions and examples of specific discrimination, plans and employers with self-funded group health plans might think they are able to consider coverage specific exclusions related to treatment of gender dysphoria in their health plans.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Not so fast&amp;hellip; The Supreme Court&amp;rsquo;s decision in Bostock v. Clayton County, Ga. issued on June 15&lt;sup&gt;th&lt;/sup&gt; found that discrimination on the basis of sex under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act extends to discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity.&amp;nbsp; In general, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act prohibits discrimination in all aspects of employment &amp;ndash; hiring, firing, compensation, and other terms, conditions, and/or privileges of employment. This also includes employer provided healthcare benefits.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Much like the Supreme Court&amp;rsquo;s decision regarding same-sex marriage in Obergefell v. Hodges, the Court&amp;rsquo;s decision in Bostock v. Clayton County, Ga. does not directly impact group health benefits or require specific coverage at all.&amp;nbsp; But, it does mean that employers that specifically exclude medically necessary services to participants for treatment related to gender identity may be at risk of litigation. Further, it validates the risk under Title VII to employers who choose not to extend employer-sponsored benefits to same-sex spouses. &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This means that employers should review their definitions of plan eligibility, coverage, and exclusions to ensure the conditions for enrollment and benefits are provided consistently without regard to sexual orientation or gender identity.&amp;nbsp; Plans that have a religious exemption or a blanket exclusion and wish to retain them, should seek the guidance of legal counsel for additional direction.&amp;nbsp; HORAN is currently working with its vendor partners to understand if any necessary action is required. &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;center&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;If you have additional questions, please contact your HORAN Account Manager or Client Specialist.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description> 
    <dc:creator>Shelly Hodges-Konys</dc:creator> 
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2020 19:44:00 GMT</pubDate> 
    <guid isPermaLink="false">f1397696-738c-4295-afcd-943feb885714:32863</guid> 
    
</item>
<item>
    <comments>https://health.horanassoc.com/health-compliance/blog/id/32692/agencies-issue-extension-of-time-under-cobra-but-should-employers-provide-new-notices#Comments</comments> 
    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> 
    <wfw:commentRss>https://health.horanassoc.com/DesktopModules/DnnForge%20-%20NewsArticles/RssComments.aspx?TabID=2479&amp;ModuleID=6073&amp;ArticleID=32692</wfw:commentRss> 
    <trackback:ping>https://health.horanassoc.com:443/DesktopModules/DnnForge%20-%20NewsArticles/Tracking/Trackback.aspx?ArticleID=32692&amp;PortalID=29&amp;TabID=2479</trackback:ping> 
    <title>Agencies Issue Extension of Time under COBRA, but Should Employers Provide New Notices? </title> 
    <link>https://health.horanassoc.com/health-compliance/blog/id/32692/agencies-issue-extension-of-time-under-cobra-but-should-employers-provide-new-notices</link> 
    <description>&lt;p&gt;You may recall that the Department of Labor and the IRS issued a Joint Rule at the end of April providing an extension of time for several participant deadlines under COBRA, HIPAA special enrollment rights, and the timeframes for certain other actions under ERISA covered health and welfare plans.&amp;nbsp; This guidance requires employers and plan sponsors to disregard the &amp;ldquo;Outbreak Period&amp;rdquo; (defined as the period from March 1&lt;sup&gt;st&lt;/sup&gt;, 2020, through 60 days after the end of the declared national emergency) for purposes of determining these plan deadlines.&amp;nbsp; Specifically, as it relates to COBRA notice requirements, employers are asking whether or not they should send new COBRA notices to participants. Unfortunately, the guidance did not specifically address what required action an employer must take to comply with its disclosure requirements.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Some of the deadlines impacted by the Final Rule include: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;The time to a participant has to elect continuation of coverage (The normal general election period is 60 days);&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;When a participant must make a payment for continuation of coverage (The normal timeframe is 45 days from the date of election to make an initial payment and subsequent payments must be made within a 30-day grace period); and&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;The timeframe participants have to notify the plan of a COBRA event (This includes the normal 30-day timeframe to provide notice of divorce or a dependent loss of eligibility due to reaching the dependent limiting age) or disability determination. &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While the guidance does not provide a clear stance on communication, COBRA&amp;rsquo;s general notice requirements provide some indication of the required action.&amp;nbsp; COBRA provides that notices given to participants must reasonably reflect a participant&amp;rsquo;s rights and how continuation may be elected.&amp;nbsp; Any information that misleads a COBRA participant could be seen as a violation of COBRA&amp;rsquo;s notice requirement and a failure of an employer&amp;rsquo;s fiduciary responsibility under ERISA.&amp;nbsp; Prudent employers, at a minimum, should make an attempt to communicate the extension of time to COBRA participants or individuals that have experienced a qualifying event during the Outbreak Period.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Because there are not currently clear guidelines of the form and substance any communication about the extension must take, employers have some flexibility in how they communicate the extension of time to participants. Further, the DOL issued Notice 2020-01 which provides relief to employers on timely providing any notices required under ERISA as long as the employer provides notice in good faith as soon as administratively practicable under the circumstances.&amp;nbsp; Good faith disclosure includes use of electronic alternative means of communicating with plan participants and beneficiaries who the employer reasonably believes have effective access to electronic means of communication, including email, text messages, and continuous access websites.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Employers that use a COBRA vendor may engage the vendor to send updated election notices and to communicate extended timeframes to make payments. Employers that administer their own COBRA or those that wish to keep COBRA administration costs at a minimum, may choose to develop their own general communication addressing the impact of the Outbreak Period on plan COBRA deadlines for distribution to plan participants. Both approaches should be seen as reasonable under the relief provided by the DOL in Notice 2020-1. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: center;&quot;&gt; &lt;em&gt;Please contact your HORAN Account Manager or Client Specialist with additional questions.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description> 
    <dc:creator>Shelly Hodges-Konys</dc:creator> 
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2020 19:26:00 GMT</pubDate> 
    <guid isPermaLink="false">f1397696-738c-4295-afcd-943feb885714:32692</guid> 
    
</item>
<item>
    <comments>https://health.horanassoc.com/health-compliance/blog/id/32501/finally-indexed-pcori-fee-announced#Comments</comments> 
    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> 
    <wfw:commentRss>https://health.horanassoc.com/DesktopModules/DnnForge%20-%20NewsArticles/RssComments.aspx?TabID=2479&amp;ModuleID=6073&amp;ArticleID=32501</wfw:commentRss> 
    <trackback:ping>https://health.horanassoc.com:443/DesktopModules/DnnForge%20-%20NewsArticles/Tracking/Trackback.aspx?ArticleID=32501&amp;PortalID=29&amp;TabID=2479</trackback:ping> 
    <title>Finally! Indexed PCORI Fee Announced</title> 
    <link>https://health.horanassoc.com/health-compliance/blog/id/32501/finally-indexed-pcori-fee-announced</link> 
    <description>&lt;p&gt;The final piece of the ACA&amp;rsquo;s Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) fee puzzle has fallen into place for employers, plan sponsors, and insurers who have been patiently waiting.&amp;nbsp; The IRS announced the new fee for plan years ending between October 1, 2019 and before October 1, 2020.&amp;nbsp; The new fee required to be reported and paid on IRS Form 720 is $2.54 per covered life.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you recall, this July 31&lt;sup&gt;st&lt;/sup&gt; was originally intended to be the final filing date for employers with plan years ending between January 1, 2019, and before October 1, 2019, as the fee was intended to sunset.&amp;nbsp; However, the SECURE Act passed late in December extended the fee for an additional 10 years.&amp;nbsp; This means that employers with a plan year ending between October 1, 2019, and December 31, 2019, also have a filing coming due. However, until yesterday, the IRS kept us all in suspense wondering what fee should be reported and paid for those plans. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This chart summarizes the fees.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table border=&quot;1&quot; cellspacing=&quot;0&quot; cellpadding=&quot;0&quot; style=&quot;width: 0px;&quot;&gt;
    &lt;colgroup&gt;&lt;col /&gt;&lt;col /&gt;&lt;col /&gt;&lt;/colgroup&gt;
    &lt;tbody&gt;
        &lt;tr&gt;
            &lt;td bgcolor=&quot;#002060&quot; width=&quot;208&quot;&gt;
            &lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: 13px; color: #ffffff;&quot;&gt;Plan Year Ending Date&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td bgcolor=&quot;#002060&quot; width=&quot;208&quot;&gt;
            &lt;p style=&quot;text-align: center;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: 13px; color: #ffffff;&quot;&gt;Filing Due Date&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td bgcolor=&quot;#002060&quot; width=&quot;208&quot;&gt;
            &lt;p style=&quot;text-align: center;&quot;&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: 13px; color: #ffffff;&quot;&gt;PCORI Fee per Covered Life&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
        &lt;/tr&gt;
        &lt;tr&gt;
            &lt;td valign=&quot;top&quot; width=&quot;208&quot;&gt;
            &lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: 13px;&quot;&gt;January 1, 2019 &amp;ndash;&lt;br /&gt;
            September 30, 2019&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td valign=&quot;top&quot; width=&quot;208&quot;&gt;
            &lt;p style=&quot;text-align: center;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: 13px;&quot;&gt;July 31, 2020&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td valign=&quot;top&quot; width=&quot;208&quot;&gt;
            &lt;p style=&quot;text-align: center;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: 13px;&quot;&gt;$2.45&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
        &lt;/tr&gt;
        &lt;tr&gt;
            &lt;td valign=&quot;top&quot; width=&quot;208&quot;&gt;
            &lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: 13px;&quot;&gt;October 1, 2019 &amp;ndash;&lt;br /&gt;
            December 31, 2019&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td valign=&quot;top&quot; width=&quot;208&quot;&gt;
            &lt;p style=&quot;text-align: center;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: 13px;&quot;&gt;July 31, 2020&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
            &lt;td valign=&quot;top&quot; width=&quot;208&quot;&gt;
            &lt;p style=&quot;text-align: center;&quot;&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: 13px;&quot;&gt;$2.54&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
            &lt;/td&gt;
        &lt;/tr&gt;
    &lt;/tbody&gt;
&lt;/table&gt;
&lt;p &gt;&lt;br /&gt;
As a reminder, all medical plans are responsible for paying PCORI fees. &amp;nbsp;The insurer pays the fee on behalf of the policyholder when a plan is fully-insured.&amp;nbsp; The employer/plan sponsor must file the Form 720 and pay the fee for self-funded plans.&amp;nbsp; This includes health reimbursement arrangements that are integrated with fully-insured medical plans. However, health reimbursement arrangements (integrated with a self-funded medical plan with the same plan year) and excepted benefits are exempt.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are four different methods employers may choose to use to for purposes of reporting and paying the PCORI fee: actual count, snapshot count, snapshot factor, and Form 5500 method. But, for plan years ending between October 1, 2019, and October 1, 2020, the IRS has granted transition relief.&amp;nbsp; The transition relief allows plan sponsors to use any &amp;ldquo;reasonable method&amp;rdquo; to calculate the average number of covered lives for purposes of reporting and pay the fee as long as that method is used consistently for the duration of the year. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;More detailed information regarding PCORI fees may be found on the &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.irs.gov/newsroom/patient-centered-outcomes-research-institute-fee&quot;&gt;IRS website&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: center;&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Please contact your HORAN representative with questions.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description> 
    <dc:creator>Shelly Hodges-Konys</dc:creator> 
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2020 12:32:00 GMT</pubDate> 
    <guid isPermaLink="false">f1397696-738c-4295-afcd-943feb885714:32501</guid> 
    
</item>
<item>
    <comments>https://health.horanassoc.com/health-compliance/blog/id/32403/insurers-give-premium-credits-due-to-covid-19-can-employers-keep-it#Comments</comments> 
    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> 
    <wfw:commentRss>https://health.horanassoc.com/DesktopModules/DnnForge%20-%20NewsArticles/RssComments.aspx?TabID=2479&amp;ModuleID=6073&amp;ArticleID=32403</wfw:commentRss> 
    <trackback:ping>https://health.horanassoc.com:443/DesktopModules/DnnForge%20-%20NewsArticles/Tracking/Trackback.aspx?ArticleID=32403&amp;PortalID=29&amp;TabID=2479</trackback:ping> 
    <title>Insurers Give Premium Credits Due to COVID-19 – Can Employers Keep It? </title> 
    <link>https://health.horanassoc.com/health-compliance/blog/id/32403/insurers-give-premium-credits-due-to-covid-19-can-employers-keep-it</link> 
    <description>&lt;p&gt;Insurers are beginning to announce premium credits due to reduced claims expenses in the wake of stay at home orders due to COVID-19, but the major question this generates is, &amp;ldquo;Can an employer reap the benefits of the credit or is the employer required to share it with employees?&amp;rdquo; &amp;nbsp;Certain insurers are telling employers that they can keep the funds and others are saying that employers should share them back with participants.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While the current premium credits are not part of the Affordable Care Act&amp;rsquo;s medical loss ratio rules, it might be prudent for employers to apply a similar analysis.&amp;nbsp; These rules require that insurers refund premiums in a market when less than 80% to 85% of the premium dollars are spent on medical care.&amp;nbsp; These refunds are seen as plan assets and employers are generally required to share rebates with employees if they have contributed to the cost of coverage, unless the plan document provides otherwise.&amp;nbsp; Therefore, in order to get to the answer, it makes sense to consider whether any portion of the premium represents a plan asset and what the plan document says about such amounts. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;Plan Documents&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;How the plan document is drafted and how it communicates how the plan is funded by the employer and participants is generally the first step in the analysis.&amp;nbsp; For example, some employers draft plan documents reflecting that the employer as the plan sponsor may retain any premium rebates, refunds, or credits to the extent that they do not exceed employer contributions.&amp;nbsp; In this case, an employer may retain any premium credit or refund unless it exceeds the portion of the &amp;nbsp;premium paid by the employer and no further analysis is usually necessary. However, a plan document or insurance policy that is silent on how rebates or similar items are shared between the employer and the employee should consider sharing to the extent a portion of the return represents participant contributions. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;Plan Assets&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To the extent that participants contribute to the cost of coverage for a plan, these participant contributions are always considered plan assets because the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) defines them as such. And, when a plan document is silent on the issue of rebates, whether an employer can retain a premium rebate, refund, or subsidy depends largely on who paid for the cost of the insurance coverage.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If an employer pays 100% of the cost of the insurance, there are no plan assets and the employer can retain 100% of a premium return without violating ERISA. &amp;nbsp;However, if the employee and the employer each pay a fixed percentage of the premium, then it follows that the employer would be expected to proportionately share the premium refund&amp;nbsp; as any amount that is determined to be a plan asset must be used for the sole purpose of providing benefits to participants (often referred to as the exclusive benefit rule).&amp;nbsp; The guidance generally outlines three ways to share with participants, including: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ol&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Reducing the employee&amp;rsquo;s portion of future premiums for employees currently enrolled;&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Reducing the employee&amp;rsquo;s portion of future premiums for employees covered under the plan at the time for which the refund is attributable; or&amp;nbsp;&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Providing a direct cash payment to current employees and current COBRA enrollees who were covered by the group health policy on which the refund was based.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;Conclusion&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Before employers make any final determination, they may also want to consider the public nature of the COVID-19 pandemic.&amp;nbsp; For example, insurers are publicly communicating premium credits and reductions.&amp;nbsp; This may create an expectation that the employer should share &amp;ndash; regulations and considerations aside &amp;ndash; posing employee relations challenges for employers who choose not to share.&amp;nbsp; To further complicate matters, different insurers are handling how they are sharing their savings with employers differently and some ways may not trigger the plan assets rules at all.&amp;nbsp; With all considerations in mind, prudent employers should consult their legal counsel for a thorough analysis of current plan language, regulation and guidance around premium credits to ensure compliance.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: center;&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Please contact your HORAN representative with additional questions.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description> 
    <dc:creator>Shelly Hodges-Konys</dc:creator> 
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2020 10:22:00 GMT</pubDate> 
    <guid isPermaLink="false">f1397696-738c-4295-afcd-943feb885714:32403</guid> 
    
</item>
<item>
    <comments>https://health.horanassoc.com/health-compliance/blog/id/32162/more-flexibility-for-employers-offering-section-125-plans#Comments</comments> 
    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> 
    <wfw:commentRss>https://health.horanassoc.com/DesktopModules/DnnForge%20-%20NewsArticles/RssComments.aspx?TabID=2479&amp;ModuleID=6073&amp;ArticleID=32162</wfw:commentRss> 
    <trackback:ping>https://health.horanassoc.com:443/DesktopModules/DnnForge%20-%20NewsArticles/Tracking/Trackback.aspx?ArticleID=32162&amp;PortalID=29&amp;TabID=2479</trackback:ping> 
    <title>More Flexibility for Employers Offering Section 125 Plans</title> 
    <link>https://health.horanassoc.com/health-compliance/blog/id/32162/more-flexibility-for-employers-offering-section-125-plans</link> 
    <description>&lt;p&gt;There is a saying about change by William Arthur Ward that I once read, &amp;ldquo;The pessimist complains about the wind; the optimist expects it to change; the realist adjusts the sails.&amp;rdquo;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; If there is one thing that we can count on from a regulatory perspective, it is that we need to learn to adjust the sails and do so quickly.&amp;nbsp; We have received numerous questions from clients over the past few weeks about the changes an employee may make to benefits received through Section 125 pre-tax plans. It has been difficult to respond because none of the guidance up to this point has provided any clear relief for flexible spending accounts, dependent care accounts, or pre-tax benefit elections.&amp;nbsp; However, yesterday the IRS issued two notices &amp;ndash; &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/n-20-29.pdf&quot;&gt;Notice 2020-29&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/n-20-33.pdf&quot;&gt;Notice 2020-33&lt;/a&gt; that provide welcome flexibility for employers.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The IRS rules generally require elections made under Section 125 plans to be irrevocable during the plan year, unless an employee experiences a qualifying mid-year change event (e.g., a change in status that results in a corresponding change in eligibility).&amp;nbsp; IRS Notice 2020-29 permits employers during the 2020 calendar year to amend their plans to allow for some additional mid-year changes that are not permitted under normal circumstances.&amp;nbsp; The new guidance permits plans to allow employees to make the following changes on a prospective basis: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Make a new election for health benefits if the employee initially declined the employer plan;&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Change an existing election for health benefits including changing plans offered by the employer and changing coverage level (for example, an employee may change from an HDHP plan to PPO coverage offered by the employer or change from employee only to family coverage); &lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Drop coverage if the employee attests that they intend to enroll in other group health insurance coverage; &lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Change or revoke a health care flexible spending account election; and/or&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Change or revoke a dependent care flexible spending account election.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Further, elections made for flexible spending accounts, are generally use-it or lose-it.&amp;nbsp; If account balances are not used by the end of the plan year (or grace period for plans that provide for a 2.5 month grace period), the money is forfeited by the participant and retained by the plan and applied to the costs of administering the plan.&amp;nbsp; The new guidance also provides flexibility for employers to allow employees an additional period of time to use unspent flexible spending account balances. &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;This relief applies only to non-calendar year plan years ending in 2020 or plan years ending in 2019 that have a grace period that extends into 2020.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; These plans may be amended to allow a participant to use funds that otherwise would have been forfeited during the 2020 calendar year for expenses incurred through December 31, 2020.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This relief is available to all health and dependent care flexible spending account plans, including those health flexible spending accounts that are limited purpose or health savings account compatible. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;IRS Notice 2020-33, provides additional relief for health care flexible spending account plans that have a carryover feature.&amp;nbsp; A carryover feature allows participants to carryover up to $500 from the previous plan year into the subsequent plan year. For plan years beginning in 2020, the maximum amount of carryover a plan can allow has been increased from $500 to $550. This amount will now be indexed for inflation on an ongoing basis.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For employers that sponsor high deductible health plans, be aware that this relief did not change the rules regarding the interaction of flexible spending accounts and health savings accounts (HSAs).&amp;nbsp; Employees that participate in a flexible spending account with a rollover provision,&amp;nbsp; a 2 &amp;frac12; grace period, or are offered an extended coverage period are ineligible to make HSA contributions for the duration of the coverage period (unless the flexible spending account is HSA compatible or amended to be HSA compatible).&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;All of the relief offered by the guidance is completely optional.&amp;nbsp; Employers may choose whether to adopt some of the provisions, all of the provisions, or none of the provisions.&amp;nbsp; Employers who wish to provide this flexibility to plan participants will need to amend their plans and have until December 31, 2021, to do so.&amp;nbsp; Plan amendments may be adopted retroactively to January 1, 2020, as long as plan participants are informed of the changes and the plan is operated in accordance with those changes. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: center;&quot;&gt; &lt;em&gt;Please contact your HORAN representative with any questions.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description> 
    <dc:creator>Shelly Hodges-Konys</dc:creator> 
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2020 20:24:00 GMT</pubDate> 
    <guid isPermaLink="false">f1397696-738c-4295-afcd-943feb885714:32162</guid> 
    
</item>
<item>
    <comments>https://health.horanassoc.com/health-compliance/blog/id/32034/section-139-disaster-relief-payments#Comments</comments> 
    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> 
    <wfw:commentRss>https://health.horanassoc.com/DesktopModules/DnnForge%20-%20NewsArticles/RssComments.aspx?TabID=2479&amp;ModuleID=6073&amp;ArticleID=32034</wfw:commentRss> 
    <trackback:ping>https://health.horanassoc.com:443/DesktopModules/DnnForge%20-%20NewsArticles/Tracking/Trackback.aspx?ArticleID=32034&amp;PortalID=29&amp;TabID=2479</trackback:ping> 
    <title>Section 139 Disaster Relief Payments</title> 
    <link>https://health.horanassoc.com/health-compliance/blog/id/32034/section-139-disaster-relief-payments</link> 
    <description>&lt;p&gt;Section 139 of the Internal Revenue Code allows employers to make and employees to receive tax-exempt payments in times of national emergency for &amp;ldquo;qualified disaster relief.&amp;rdquo;&amp;nbsp; The President declaring a state of national emergency on March 13&lt;sup&gt;th&lt;/sup&gt; resulted in the coronavirus pandemic being a federally declared disaster, which paved the way for organizations to provide relief to individuals under this provision.&amp;nbsp; But, given the fact that this is a tax provision and not a health and welfare benefit, you might ask why we are posting a blog on the topic.&amp;nbsp; The answer is simple.&amp;nbsp; We have seen at least one major insurer and several third-party benefits administrators market a platform to support payments by employers under this provision.&amp;nbsp; However, there are a few things employers should know about this section of the tax code first.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Section 139 is not new.&amp;nbsp; The provision was originally enacted in the wake of the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001.&amp;nbsp; It is intended to provide a way for organizations, often employers, to provide financial assistance to individuals experiencing financial hardship as a direct result of a disaster. Other past federally-declared disasters include events like hurricanes, flooding and wildfires &amp;ndash; the current coronavirus pandemic is the first disaster of its kind to trigger disaster relief. &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For payments to be excluded from income and deductible by an employer, payments must be for &amp;ldquo;qualified disaster relief.&amp;rdquo;&amp;nbsp; An expense is qualified if it is made to reimburse the reasonable and necessary personal, family, living or funeral expenses incurred as a result of the disaster.&amp;nbsp; In order to be a qualified reimbursable expense, the expense must not be reimbursed by insurance, wage replacement benefits, or otherwise. Some examples of what might be considered reasonable and necessary expenses in the current environment include: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Medical expenses not reimbursed by insurance&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Home office expenses&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Additional child care expenses&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Mental health and wellness expenses&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;Additional expenses from shelter at home orders like masks, cleaning supplies, and hand sanitizers&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Employees are not required to substantiate expenses as long as the payments made are reasonable as compared to the actual expenses incurred.&amp;nbsp; However, it is recommended that the employer maintain some level of records that reimbursement was for a qualified disaster relief expense.&amp;nbsp; This could take the form of an attestation from the employee that the employee incurred qualified disaster relief expenses. Maintaining records is where the vendor community can add value &amp;ndash; they can record and validate the expenses incurred under Section 139 on an employer&amp;rsquo;s behalf and they can help limit potential abuse. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you are an employer considering providing relief to employees under Section 139, it is recommended that you consult your legal counsel or tax advisors for additional guidance.&amp;nbsp; It is unlikely that all of your employees will qualify for disaster relief payments because not all individuals will incur reasonable and necessary expenses as a direct result of the pandemic.&amp;nbsp; Additionally, while these payments are exempt from federal income tax withholding, the same may not be true under state and local tax provisions. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: center;&quot;&gt; &lt;em&gt;Please contact your HORAN account representative with additional questions.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description> 
    <dc:creator>Shelly Hodges-Konys</dc:creator> 
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2020 09:58:00 GMT</pubDate> 
    <guid isPermaLink="false">f1397696-738c-4295-afcd-943feb885714:32034</guid> 
    
</item>
<item>
    <comments>https://health.horanassoc.com/health-compliance/blog/id/31986/dol-and-irs-give-the-gift-of-time#Comments</comments> 
    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> 
    <wfw:commentRss>https://health.horanassoc.com/DesktopModules/DnnForge%20-%20NewsArticles/RssComments.aspx?TabID=2479&amp;ModuleID=6073&amp;ArticleID=31986</wfw:commentRss> 
    <trackback:ping>https://health.horanassoc.com:443/DesktopModules/DnnForge%20-%20NewsArticles/Tracking/Trackback.aspx?ArticleID=31986&amp;PortalID=29&amp;TabID=2479</trackback:ping> 
    <title>DOL and IRS Give the Gift of Time</title> 
    <link>https://health.horanassoc.com/health-compliance/blog/id/31986/dol-and-irs-give-the-gift-of-time</link> 
    <description>&lt;p&gt;Whether you are an employer plan sponsor or a plan participant, you can breathe a little easier knowing that DOL and the IRS has given you the gift of time.&amp;nbsp; The final rule issued this week extends certain notification deadlines for plans covered under ERISA or the Internal Revenue Code during the period of national emergency due to COVID-19. &amp;nbsp;The rule provides that the period from March 1, 2020, to 60 days after the announced end of the national emergency, called the &amp;ldquo;outbreak period,&amp;rdquo; must be disregarded for purposes of many plan notification requirements described below. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;HIPAA Special Enrollment Periods &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Under HIPAA, group health plans must offer otherwise eligible individuals an opportunity to enroll in coverage if it was originally declined under certain circumstances.&amp;nbsp; Those include: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;an employee or dependent&amp;rsquo;s loss of other group health plan coverage;&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;an eligible employee&amp;rsquo;s acquisition of a new dependent through marriage, birth, or adoption, or placement for adoption; and/or&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;loss of Medicaid or CHIP coverage or becoming eligible for a state premium assistance subsidy under Medicaid or CHIP.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Generally, eligible employees must request enrollment under the terms of the plan within 30 days of a special enrollment event (or within 60 days of loss of Medicaid/CHIP or becoming eligible for state premium assistance subsidy).&amp;nbsp; Because the outbreak period must be disregarded for purposes of determining if a timely request for enrollment was made, employees experiencing a special enrollment event will have until 30 or 60 days after the outbreak period has ended to enroll. For example, an individual who has a baby on May 1&lt;sup&gt;st&lt;/sup&gt;, 2020, will have 30 days after the outbreak period ends to enroll the new dependent. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;COBRA&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;COBRA rules give qualified beneficiaries 60 days to elect continuation of coverage and 45 days after the date of election to make a payment.&amp;nbsp; Continuation may be terminated if premium is not paid on time.&amp;nbsp; Premium is considered on time if it is paid within 30 days of the date for the which the premium is due.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For purposes of determining timely election and payment of premiums, the outbreak period must again be disregarded.&amp;nbsp; These time frames will apply once the outbreak period ends.&amp;nbsp; This is true for the 60-day COBRA election period and the dates for making COBRA premium payments.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The same is also true for other required notices including: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;the notice that the employer or participant must give the plan when coverage is lost;&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;the COBRA election notice the plan must give a qualified beneficiary when coverage ends; and&lt;/li&gt;
    &lt;li&gt;the 60-day notification a qualified beneficiary must give the plan due to disability. &lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A participant whose group health plan coverage ends due to termination of employment on March 31&lt;sup&gt;st&lt;/sup&gt;, 2020, has 60 days from the date of the end of the outbreak period to elect continuation of coverage under COBRA.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;Claims Procedures and External Review &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ERISA requires that plans establish a reasonable procedure governing the filing, determination, and appeal of benefit claims.&amp;nbsp; This includes providing participants a reasonable opportunity to appeal adverse benefit determinations. &amp;nbsp;Further, group health plans and disability plans must provide participants at least 180 days following receipt of an adverse benefit determination to appeal (60 days in the case of other welfare benefit plans).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Additionally, ERISA sets forth standards for external review that apply to non-grandfathered group health plans and health insurance issuers offering non-grandfathered group health insurance coverage and provides for either a state external review process or a federal external review process. Standards for external review processes and time frames for submitting claims to the independent reviewer for group health plans or health insurance issuers may vary depending on whether a plan uses a state or federal external review process. For plans or issuers that use the federal external review process, the process must allow at least four months after the receipt of a notice of an adverse benefit determination or final internal adverse benefit determination for a request for an external review to be filed. The federal external review process also provides for a preliminary review of a request for external review. The regulation provides that if such request is not complete, the federal external review process must provide for a notification that describes the information or materials needed to make the request complete, and the plan or issuer must allow a claimant to perfect the request for external review within the four-month filing period or within the 48-hour period following the receipt of the notification, whichever is later.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;For purposes of both claims appeal and request for external review, the outbreak period must be disregarded when determining the date by which a participant must file a request for appeal, a request for external review, and for making the external review process complete.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;Conclusion&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While this relief is welcome, especially for employers whose businesses may be temporarily closed due to the pandemic, these new rules will take some getting used to.&amp;nbsp; The timing is a little tricky.&amp;nbsp; The important thing to remember is that the clock really begins 60 days after the date the national emergency ends. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: center;&quot;&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;Please contact your HORAN representatives for additional information.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description> 
    <dc:creator>Shelly Hodges-Konys</dc:creator> 
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2020 21:12:00 GMT</pubDate> 
    <guid isPermaLink="false">f1397696-738c-4295-afcd-943feb885714:31986</guid> 
    
</item>
<item>
    <comments>https://health.horanassoc.com/health-compliance/blog/id/31888/employer-provided-student-loan-repayment-gaining-traction#Comments</comments> 
    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> 
    <wfw:commentRss>https://health.horanassoc.com/DesktopModules/DnnForge%20-%20NewsArticles/RssComments.aspx?TabID=2479&amp;ModuleID=6073&amp;ArticleID=31888</wfw:commentRss> 
    <trackback:ping>https://health.horanassoc.com:443/DesktopModules/DnnForge%20-%20NewsArticles/Tracking/Trackback.aspx?ArticleID=31888&amp;PortalID=29&amp;TabID=2479</trackback:ping> 
    <title>Employer Provided Student Loan Repayment Gaining Traction?</title> 
    <link>https://health.horanassoc.com/health-compliance/blog/id/31888/employer-provided-student-loan-repayment-gaining-traction</link> 
    <description>&lt;p&gt;Over the past several years, we have seen more and more employers wishing to provide a student loan benefit to their employees as an employee attraction and retention tool.&amp;nbsp; These programs take many forms and student loan repayment vendors can ease the process for employees (and employers making contributions on their behalf), by facilitating the payroll deduction process and making those payments directly to the loan institution. So, in a time when many employers are looking to save money on benefit costs, why are these programs getting attention in the past several weeks?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Student loan repayment is most commonly a taxable benefit to employees.&amp;nbsp; However, a provision contained in the CARES Act passed in late March provides employers a way to make student loan payments on a tax-free basis through December 31, 2020.&amp;nbsp; Employers may make payments toward an employee&amp;rsquo;s student debt of up to $5,250 on a tax-free basis if done through a Section 127 plan.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Employers who already have an educational assistance program under Internal Revenue Code Section 127 for reimbursement of tuition expenses will have an easier time extending this benefit to employees.&amp;nbsp; This is because the change in the CARES Act allows employers with these plans to simply make an amendment to their current plans to extend the benefit to include payment of principal and interest on &amp;ldquo;qualified education loans.&amp;rdquo; Employers who do not currently have educational assistance programs in place will need to engage qualified legal counsel to draft a plan document to put a program in place. But, it is important to note that the $5,250 limit referenced above includes all benefits received under the plan (tuition reimbursement and student loan repayment for plans that allow both). &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We are often asked whether employees can choose between student loan repayment and other benefits.&amp;nbsp; The general answer to this question is &amp;ldquo;no.&amp;rdquo;&amp;nbsp; Student loan repayment, whether offered as part of a Section 127 Educational Assistance Program or not, is not a qualified benefit under the Section 125 cafeteria plan rules.&amp;nbsp; However, as a matter of budgeting, employers may reallocate a portion of their current benefits expenses from one expense to another.&amp;nbsp; For example, employers may choose to reduce their overall HSA contribution from $1000 per employee to $500 per employee and reallocate that amount to a student loan repayment program. &lt;/p&gt;
For employers who already have Section 127 plans and those intending to offer this benefit in 2020, this may be welcome news.&amp;nbsp; For other employers, timing may not be right to jump in.&amp;nbsp; Many are hopeful this tax relief will extend beyond 2020, but only time will tell.
&lt;div style=&quot;text-align: center;&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;span style=&quot;text-align: center;&quot;&gt;Please contact your HORAN representative with additional questions.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description> 
    <dc:creator>Shelly Hodges-Konys</dc:creator> 
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2020 08:14:00 GMT</pubDate> 
    <guid isPermaLink="false">f1397696-738c-4295-afcd-943feb885714:31888</guid> 
    
</item>
<item>
    <comments>https://health.horanassoc.com/health-compliance/blog/id/31755/collecting-premium-payments-from-employees-who-are-furloughed-or-on-leave-of-absence#Comments</comments> 
    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> 
    <wfw:commentRss>https://health.horanassoc.com/DesktopModules/DnnForge%20-%20NewsArticles/RssComments.aspx?TabID=2479&amp;ModuleID=6073&amp;ArticleID=31755</wfw:commentRss> 
    <trackback:ping>https://health.horanassoc.com:443/DesktopModules/DnnForge%20-%20NewsArticles/Tracking/Trackback.aspx?ArticleID=31755&amp;PortalID=29&amp;TabID=2479</trackback:ping> 
    <title>Collecting Premium Payments from Employees Who are Furloughed or on Leave of Absence</title> 
    <link>https://health.horanassoc.com/health-compliance/blog/id/31755/collecting-premium-payments-from-employees-who-are-furloughed-or-on-leave-of-absence</link> 
    <description>&lt;p&gt;One of the questions we are often asked by employers is how to collect premium payments from employees who may not receive a paycheck or who have a reduced paycheck because they are not actively at work.&amp;nbsp; These questions arise when employees are on an approved leave of absence or, as is common in the era of COVID-19, when employers place employees on furlough.&amp;nbsp; Employers often look to their premium payment policies under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) for guidance.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The premium payment options under an unpaid FMLA include paying premiums in advance of the leave, paying premiums during the leave from any compensation received during the leave, making payments on a post-tax basis, and making catch-up contributions upon return.&amp;nbsp; If an employee is on a paid FMLA leave, the premium payments should continue to be paid in the same way they would be paid for any other type of paid leave (presumably through payroll withholding). &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;These same premium payment options are available during a furlough or approved leave of absence, but not all of the options make sense depending on the circumstance. For example, paying premiums in advance might make sense for an approved leave of absence, but paying premiums in advance rarely works in a furlough situation because the leave must be known and anticipated in advance. Continuing to deduct premium payments from any compensation received may be problematic if there are not enough wages received.&amp;nbsp; However, if a different payment option is used than is used for FMLA leaves, an employer needs to go back and review its FMLA policy as revisions may be necessary since employers may not require more of employees on FMLA leave than those on other forms of unpaid leave. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are two premium payment options that employers generally employ when a leave is unanticipated and/or uncompensated: paying premiums on a post-tax basis during the leave and making catch-up contributions upon return from leave.&amp;nbsp; Making premium payments on a post-tax basis, while it works for the employer, may not be ideal for employees.&amp;nbsp; This is because post-tax premium payments can increase the employee&amp;rsquo;s taxable wages and reduce their cash flow.&amp;nbsp; For employees experiencing financial hardship due to reduced hours or wages, making premium payments on a post-tax basis can create additional strain.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Another option to consider is allowing employees to make up missed contributions upon return from leave by reallocating the premium across the remaining pay periods in the taxable year.&amp;nbsp; While this option is most beneficial for employees, it may create additional risk for employers if the employee does not return from the leave or terminates employment and there is not enough payroll to cover missed contributions.&amp;nbsp; Depending on the applicable state&amp;rsquo;s wage withholding laws, an employer may have the ability to recoup any unpaid premiums from other amounts owed to the employee, but the employer should check with counsel to ensure it is not violating any state laws before doing so. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While there are rarely perfect circumstances and perfect solutions, we hope this information helps you determine the best path forward for your organization.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: center;&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Please contact your HORAN representative for additional information.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description> 
    <dc:creator>Shelly Hodges-Konys</dc:creator> 
    <pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2020 18:49:00 GMT</pubDate> 
    <guid isPermaLink="false">f1397696-738c-4295-afcd-943feb885714:31755</guid> 
    
</item>
<item>
    <comments>https://health.horanassoc.com/health-compliance/blog/id/31445/health-plan-continuation-for-those-taking-epsla-or-efmlea-protected-leave#Comments</comments> 
    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> 
    <wfw:commentRss>https://health.horanassoc.com/DesktopModules/DnnForge%20-%20NewsArticles/RssComments.aspx?TabID=2479&amp;ModuleID=6073&amp;ArticleID=31445</wfw:commentRss> 
    <trackback:ping>https://health.horanassoc.com:443/DesktopModules/DnnForge%20-%20NewsArticles/Tracking/Trackback.aspx?ArticleID=31445&amp;PortalID=29&amp;TabID=2479</trackback:ping> 
    <title>Health Plan Continuation for Those Taking EPSLA or EFMLEA Protected Leave</title> 
    <link>https://health.horanassoc.com/health-compliance/blog/id/31445/health-plan-continuation-for-those-taking-epsla-or-efmlea-protected-leave</link> 
    <description>&lt;p&gt;Originally authored by &lt;a href=&quot;https://graydon.law/author/barnettl/&quot;&gt;Lyndsey Barnett&lt;/a&gt; at Graydon Law and posted &lt;a href=&quot;https://graydon.law/health-plan-continuation-for-those-taking-epsla-or-efmlea-protected-leave/&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Under the FMLA, an employer is required to continue an employee&amp;rsquo;s group health plan coverage at active employee rates during the length of the FMLA leave.&amp;nbsp; Therefore, it came as no surprise that the DOL temporary regulations that were released yesterday on the Emergency Paid &amp;nbsp;Sick Leave Act (&amp;ldquo;EPSLA&amp;rdquo;) and the Emergency Family Medical Leave Expansion Act (&amp;ldquo;EFMLEA&amp;rdquo;) require employers to continue an employee&amp;rsquo;s group health plan coverage during the protected leave.&amp;nbsp; The thing that may be surprising to some is that the DOL confirmed that this continuation of health plan coverage applies to all employers subject to the EPSLA and EFMLEA and not just to those that are normally subject to the FMLA (i.e., this applies to all employers with fewer than 500 employees and not just those with 50 or more employees).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;This continuation of &amp;nbsp;benefit coverage applies to medical care, surgical care, hospital care, dental care, eye care, mental health counseling, substance abuse treatment if the employer provides such benefits.&amp;nbsp; The coverage in these health plans must remain the same for employees on EPSLA or EFMLEA as if they had remained actively at work.&amp;nbsp; Any changes made to the health plans for active employees are permitted to be made for the employees on EPSLA or EFMLEA as well.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: center;&quot;&gt;Please contact your HORAN representative with any questions. &lt;/p&gt;</description> 
    <dc:creator>Shelly Hodges-Konys</dc:creator> 
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2020 13:02:00 GMT</pubDate> 
    <guid isPermaLink="false">f1397696-738c-4295-afcd-943feb885714:31445</guid> 
    
</item>
<item>
    <comments>https://health.horanassoc.com/health-compliance/blog/id/31387/the-cares-act-provides-clarity-for-health-benefits-plans-amongst-relief-for-individuals-and-businesses#Comments</comments> 
    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> 
    <wfw:commentRss>https://health.horanassoc.com/DesktopModules/DnnForge%20-%20NewsArticles/RssComments.aspx?TabID=2479&amp;ModuleID=6073&amp;ArticleID=31387</wfw:commentRss> 
    <trackback:ping>https://health.horanassoc.com:443/DesktopModules/DnnForge%20-%20NewsArticles/Tracking/Trackback.aspx?ArticleID=31387&amp;PortalID=29&amp;TabID=2479</trackback:ping> 
    <title>The CARES Act Provides Clarity for Health Benefits Plans Amongst Relief for Individuals and Businesses</title> 
    <link>https://health.horanassoc.com/health-compliance/blog/id/31387/the-cares-act-provides-clarity-for-health-benefits-plans-amongst-relief-for-individuals-and-businesses</link> 
    <description>&lt;p&gt;The Coronavirus Aid Relief and Economic Security (CARES) Act was signed by the President on Friday afternoon, March 27&lt;sup&gt;th&lt;/sup&gt;, 2020.&amp;nbsp; The new legislation brings welcome clarity to several unanswered questions left looming under the Families First Coronavirus Response Act (FFCRA) signed earlier this month.&amp;nbsp; In addition to answering questions related to telehealth and COVID-19 testing, the new rules also relax some restrictions for tax free reimbursement of certain over-the-counter expenses which is a welcome surprise for employers. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;Telehealth&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The FFCRA signed earlier this month made it clear that telehealth services could be covered at 100% without cost-sharing including deductibles and coinsurance for services related to the diagnosis of COVID-19 without disqualifying high deductible health plans for purposes of making contributions to a health savings account. However, what was unclear under current physical distancing guidelines was the application of telehealth for other services.&amp;nbsp; The CARES Act clarifies that a high deductible health plan may waive participant cost-sharing for all telehealth services through 2021 without jeopardizing an individual&amp;rsquo;s eligibility to make health savings account contributions. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;COVID-19 Screening &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Under the FFCRA, both fully-insured and self-funded group health plans are required to cover the initial testing and any health services related to the diagnosis of COVID-19 at 100% without application of cost-sharing provisions.&amp;nbsp; It was clear that this applied to all in-network services, however, the rules were less clear when it came to out of network services.&amp;nbsp; The CARES Act addresses out of network services and requires that they be reimbursed at the &amp;ldquo;cash price&amp;rdquo; or at a lower negotiated price as accepted by the provider.&amp;nbsp; The new rules also provide flexibility to allow for new types of testing that may be developed during the emergency period without limitation to testing approved by the Food and Drug Administration. In addition, the new rules require coverage of a COVID-19 vaccine as preventive when it becomes available. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;Over-the-Counter Medications&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The CARES Act also reverses provisions under the Affordable Care Act that prohibit the reimbursement of over-the-counter medications without a prescription including menstrual products.&amp;nbsp; Over-the-Counter medications may now be reimbursed without a prescription for plan years beginning after December 31, 2019.&amp;nbsp; This applies to Health Savings Accounts (HSAs), Healthcare Flexible Spending Accounts (FSAs), and Health Reimbursement Arrangements (HRAs).&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;center&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Please contact your HORAN representative with any questions.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description> 
    <dc:creator>Shelly Hodges-Konys</dc:creator> 
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2020 18:50:00 GMT</pubDate> 
    <guid isPermaLink="false">f1397696-738c-4295-afcd-943feb885714:31387</guid> 
    
</item>
<item>
    <comments>https://health.horanassoc.com/health-compliance/blog/id/31330/what-makes-a-carrier-offered-enrollment-special#Comments</comments> 
    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> 
    <wfw:commentRss>https://health.horanassoc.com/DesktopModules/DnnForge%20-%20NewsArticles/RssComments.aspx?TabID=2479&amp;ModuleID=6073&amp;ArticleID=31330</wfw:commentRss> 
    <trackback:ping>https://health.horanassoc.com:443/DesktopModules/DnnForge%20-%20NewsArticles/Tracking/Trackback.aspx?ArticleID=31330&amp;PortalID=29&amp;TabID=2479</trackback:ping> 
    <title>What Makes a Carrier Offered Enrollment Special? </title> 
    <link>https://health.horanassoc.com/health-compliance/blog/id/31330/what-makes-a-carrier-offered-enrollment-special</link> 
    <description>&lt;p&gt;Many health insurance carriers are responding to the COVID-19 pandemic by offering employees who chose to waive their employer health insurance coverage an opportunity to enroll now.&amp;nbsp; But, what makes this event &amp;ldquo;special&amp;rdquo;? Well, a pandemic makes this a special event because this is not a Special Enrollment in accordance with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA). &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;HIPAA provides that group health plans give participants an opportunity to enroll in health plan coverage in certain circumstances if a participant chose not to enroll when first eligible.&amp;nbsp; HIPAA&amp;rsquo;s special enrollment events include loss of other coverage, gaining a new dependent, and becoming eligible or losing eligibility for premium assistance through programs like Medicaid or the Children&amp;rsquo;s Health Insurance Program.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Recent events and legislation haven&amp;rsquo;t changed these requirements and they still apply to all group health plans.&amp;nbsp; So, while an insurer might be offering an opportunity to enroll in coverage right now, that opportunity is not a HIPAA Special Enrollment.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So, what does this mean and what should an employer do? It means that an employer is not legally required to offer enrollment just because an insurer offers the opportunity.&amp;nbsp; In fact, it&amp;rsquo;s a little more complicated than it seems at first glance. The reasons why involve the rules that govern pre-tax plans, whether an employer uses a benefits administration or online enrollment system, and the potential risk to the group health plan.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;First, offering a &amp;ldquo;special&amp;rdquo; enrollment to employees who waived coverage now, does not create a Section 125 change in status event for employers that allow pre-tax premium contributions through payroll.&amp;nbsp; Only a HIPAA special enrollment where there is a loss of other coverage or another mid-year qualifying event (which this wouldn&amp;rsquo;t be without the employee having an additional circumstance) would allow an employer to take pre-tax premium deductions under normal circumstances. Therefore, employers that have pre-tax plans under Section 125 could be seen as violating their plan and the regulations if they allow pre-tax payroll deductions for coverage offered through this carrier &amp;ldquo;special&amp;rdquo; enrollment.&amp;nbsp; If an employer wants to take advantage of this offering, a safer approach (assuming the IRS doesn&amp;rsquo;t release additional guidance) would be for employees who enroll through this insurer special enrollment to have their contributions come out on an after-tax basis.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; If an employer does not already have a payroll code set up, it will take a little extra work to manually process the changes or program a new code.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Second, benefits administration systems can be incredibly complex because it takes work to program these rules-based systems.&amp;nbsp; We&amp;rsquo;ve heard many employers complain about the time it takes to program changes in preparation for open enrollment and the expense to have changes programmed into the system.&amp;nbsp; Can you imagine what it will be like if every insured client reaches out to their benefits administration vendor to program a change at once?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Last, employers must consider the reasons why individuals who were eligible to enroll in coverage when it was first available.&amp;nbsp; The unfortunate reality is that inviting employees onto the plan could expose the plan to subpar risk creating adverse selection driving plan costs up.&amp;nbsp; Anyone who had other coverage and lost it would be eligible to enroll in the plan under the HIPAA Special Enrollment rules mentioned above.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So, while a &amp;ldquo;special&amp;rdquo; enrollment sounds nice and gives everyone the warm and fuzzies, employers should give it a little more consideration before moving forward. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style=&quot;text-align: center;&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Please contact your HORAN representative for additional information.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description> 
    <dc:creator>Shelly Hodges-Konys</dc:creator> 
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2020 17:53:00 GMT</pubDate> 
    <guid isPermaLink="false">f1397696-738c-4295-afcd-943feb885714:31330</guid> 
    
</item>
<item>
    <comments>https://health.horanassoc.com/health-compliance/blog/id/31219/ohio-order-to-give-employers-premium-flexibility-during-state-of-emergency#Comments</comments> 
    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> 
    <wfw:commentRss>https://health.horanassoc.com/DesktopModules/DnnForge%20-%20NewsArticles/RssComments.aspx?TabID=2479&amp;ModuleID=6073&amp;ArticleID=31219</wfw:commentRss> 
    <trackback:ping>https://health.horanassoc.com:443/DesktopModules/DnnForge%20-%20NewsArticles/Tracking/Trackback.aspx?ArticleID=31219&amp;PortalID=29&amp;TabID=2479</trackback:ping> 
    <title>Ohio Order to Give Employers Premium Flexibility During State of Emergency</title> 
    <link>https://health.horanassoc.com/health-compliance/blog/id/31219/ohio-order-to-give-employers-premium-flexibility-during-state-of-emergency</link> 
    <description>&lt;p&gt;On Friday, March 20, 2020, Lieutenant Governor Jon Husted on behalf of the Ohio Department of Insurance (ODOI) announced a requirement for insurers in the state to provide flexibility for employers and employees as they navigate the challenges presented by the current state of emergency due to the COVID-19 pandemic.&amp;nbsp; These regulations are temporary and intended to take effect immediately and conclude when the state of emergency is over. The rules apply to all group health plans in the state including health insurance carriers, stop loss carriers, multiple employer welfare arrangements (MEWAs), and other entities covered under the jurisdiction of the ODOI. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;Premium Payment Grace Period&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;During this time, health insurers must allow their insureds to defer payment of premiums for up to 60 calendar days from the date they would otherwise be due. Insurers may not assess any interest during this time. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;Employee Eligibility&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Insurers must also allow employers to continue to cover employees under group health plan coverage even if an employee would otherwise become ineligible under the terms of the plan due to a decrease in hours worked regardless of any actively-at-work provision contained in the policy.&amp;nbsp; Further, insurers are prohibited from increasing premiums due to a decrease in enrollment or participation in the plan. This flexibility is especially important for employers because insurance policies often contain enrollment or participation requirements that allow insurers to adjust premiums in the event of significant changes in the number of enrolled employees. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;Continuation of Coverage&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Employers with 20 or more employees must also be able to allow eligible employees to continue coverage in accordance with the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (COBRA) in accordance with normal notice and election procedures as long as &lt;i&gt;at least one employee&lt;/i&gt; remains actively employed. The same holds true for employers with less than 20 employees that are subject to state continuation rules rather than COBRA. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style=&quot;text-decoration: underline;&quot;&gt;Special Enrollment&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Last, for employees that lose coverage must be offered a special enrollment to enroll in new coverage. Generally, coverage purchased through the federal marketplace program is effective the first of the month following the date of enrollment. Insurers offering policies outside of the marketplace are instructed to waive their normal procedures and make coverage effective the first day following loss of employment.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Please contact your HORAN representative with any questions. &lt;/p&gt;</description> 
    <dc:creator>Shelly Hodges-Konys</dc:creator> 
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2020 00:06:00 GMT</pubDate> 
    <guid isPermaLink="false">f1397696-738c-4295-afcd-943feb885714:31219</guid> 
    
</item>
<item>
    <comments>https://health.horanassoc.com/health-compliance/blog/id/31141/fmla-changes-impact-your-health-plan#Comments</comments> 
    <slash:comments>0</slash:comments> 
    <wfw:commentRss>https://health.horanassoc.com/DesktopModules/DnnForge%20-%20NewsArticles/RssComments.aspx?TabID=2479&amp;ModuleID=6073&amp;ArticleID=31141</wfw:commentRss> 
    <trackback:ping>https://health.horanassoc.com:443/DesktopModules/DnnForge%20-%20NewsArticles/Tracking/Trackback.aspx?ArticleID=31141&amp;PortalID=29&amp;TabID=2479</trackback:ping> 
    <title>FMLA Changes Impact Your Health Plan</title> 
    <link>https://health.horanassoc.com/health-compliance/blog/id/31141/fmla-changes-impact-your-health-plan</link> 
    <description>&lt;p&gt;Originally authored March 19, 2020 by&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href=&quot;https://graydon.law/author/barnettl/&quot;&gt;Lyndsey Barnett&lt;/a&gt; at Graydon Law and posted &lt;a href=&quot;https://graydon.law/fmla-changes-impact-your-health-plan/&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you have fewer than 500 employees and provide health insurance, you need to read this post.&amp;nbsp; This impacts even those small employers who are not otherwise subject to the FMLA.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; These new changes apply to all employers with fewer than 500 employees. This means even those companies that have fewer than 50 employees must comply with these new provisions (but are still exempt from complying with the rest of the FMLA). This article only discusses the impact on group health plans.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While the law does make some changes to&amp;nbsp;health insurance (as referenced in our previous post), the portions of the law on the FMLA and the emergency paid sick leave don&amp;rsquo;t directly make any changes to the requirements surrounding health insurance during FMLA.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;However, now that additional people are eligible for FMLA leave more people will be able to continue their health insurance coverage under the FMLA provision.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The FMLA requires employers to continue an employee&amp;rsquo;s group health plan coverage during the period of the FMLA leave.&amp;nbsp; During FMLA leave, the employee cannot be charged more than the active employee premium for coverage. &amp;nbsp;The coverage provided is active employee coverage and not COBRA. Therefore, if you were unsure of whether your employees who were not at work for COVID-19 related reasons could continue their group health coverage (and by the number of calls we have received in the past few days many of you had that question), the question has now been answered for you.&amp;nbsp; During the period of time that an employee now has protected FMLA leave, they must be able to continue their health plan coverage.&amp;nbsp; It is unclear at this time whether this health care continuation right will apply to those private employers with fewer than 50 employees since this is an existing right under FMLA and small employers are only subject to the new provisions.&amp;nbsp; We hope the regulations clarify this point.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Further since this form of FMLA is a paid leave, the employee likely does not have a mid-year change event to drop coverage even if they would like to do so.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Therefore, premiums will need to continue to come out of their pay while they are on paid leave.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;All group health plans, whether fully-insured or self-insured, should already contain a provision that provides that an employee&amp;rsquo;s coverage continues while the employee is on FMLA leave.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;Your SPD may have general language in it or it may list the reasons for FMLA.&amp;nbsp; If it lists the reasons out to an individual that qualifies for FMLA leave, you need to consider whether a summary of material modifications is necessary for your plan.&amp;nbsp; You have time to worry about whether you need to change your health plan documents though so that doesn&amp;rsquo;t need to be a priority, but you should make sure that you are properly&amp;nbsp;implementing this change and communicating it to impacted employees.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The DOL was instructed to issue guidance on these FMLA changes within 15 days and we will continue to update our blog as guidance comes out.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
Please contact your HORAN representative with questions.&amp;nbsp;</description> 
    <dc:creator>Shelly Hodges-Konys</dc:creator> 
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2020 13:30:00 GMT</pubDate> 
    <guid isPermaLink="false">f1397696-738c-4295-afcd-943feb885714:31141</guid> 
    
</item>

    </channel>
</rss>